773
'Disbelief': Pentagon reporter can't find one military official who liked Hegseth's speech
(www.rawstory.com)
this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2025
773 points (99.6% liked)
politics
25887 readers
2889 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I was kinda hoping that they would have done that coup today and put those two on trial for being enemies of the constitution. The military swears an oath to the constitution and those two knuckleheads were directing the generals to do unconstitutional shit. I’m pretty sure this coup scenario would be better than what is going on currently
It's much to early to talk about a coup. But when Trump really wants the US military to act against US citizens, I don't think that's an order the military can possibly obey. I think that will be coup time.
I can't believe we're seriously talking about this.
I agree with your assessment. They all had a chance to speak with each other at this meeting, and I'll bet at least some of them started to talk about worst-case scenarios.
They won't act spontaneously, it will be in response to a seriously illegal demand.
It’s just all really awful
The military is not going to do a violence to protect the country unless ordered to do so (by the executive branch) OR a violence is done to them first.
If they’re to be believed they’re honorable / noble enough to want to protect the nation from the president then they’re honorable / noble enough to not act first. So, double edged sword and all that
Yeah that’s a good point
There are 300 million of us lmao you just gotta convince people to remove their representation and replace it with someone competent. Im sure the generals probably believe its not their duty or place and also fear to consequences of turning the USA into a military rule for even a second. It's time to stop praying to a higher power for a miracle and start removing your congress people from office. They can't hide from their voters for ever.
Our system is corrupted from top to bottom. The vote harder strategy has failed
The problem is, people rarely view their own representative as the problem (as long as it's who they voted for). So if a republican view sees the country going to shut during a republican administration, at best, they'll think it's a bunch of other Republican reps that are messing things up for the person they chose.
Im southern. I absolutely view my congressmen and senators as a problem.
This country is gerrymandered as shit. A lot of people do view "their" representative as part of the problem, but what recourse do they have when decades of political gamesmanship has made their votes no longer count?
I covered this in my parenthetical...
That would mean immediate civil war which would be horrific for everyone. It's a lever that should only be pulled as a last resort
They declared war on America yesterday and encouraged the military to commit war crimes against American citizens…..how is that not a declaration of civil war? Genuinely curious
Yesterday was a propaganda event.
I disagree they have done everything they said they would do and were way far down the tyranny rabbit hole