this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
574 points (96.9% liked)

politics

25887 readers
2858 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Feyd@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  1. Show me in their platform where it says that. https://democrats.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/2024-Democratic-Party-Platform.pdf
  2. Show me in their platform where it says they still support that. Show me any recent serious party wide efforts. Show me in kamala harris' 2024 platform.
  3. You don't have to pass constitutional amendments to pass laws. They could introduce bills even if they don't pass and campaign on them.

They do the bare minimum to trick people like you into thinking they give a single fuck about you. I'm sorry, but that don't. The Democrat party is owned by wealthy interests that unlike the Republicans are smart enough to give the working class enough crumbs to keep society from collapsing, but that's not enough to energize people to vote anymore because life just keeps getting harder and harder for the average American even when they're in charge.

All that isn't to say that people shouldn't vote for a corporate dem when it's that or a republican, but you're completely blind if you can't see that there are real problems with the party that are contributing to their losses.

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  1. Page 48

Democrats will also fight to strengthen public financing with small-dollar matching for all federal candidates and crack down on foreign nationals who try to influence elections. We will keep super PACs wholly independent of campaigns and parties and pass a constitutional amendment that will ban all private financing from federal elections. Democrats will end “dark money” by requiring full disclosure of contributors and ban 501(c)(4) organizations from spending on elections. And, to curb the influence of special interests in our elections, Democrats will prohibit corporate PACs and lobbyists from donating to anyone they lobby.

It's also been a stated goal during campaigns for literally every DNC I've ever seen, and it's been a constant political battle for over 15 years with bills being constantly introduced.

  1. YOU DON'T BELIEVE THEY WANTED TO PASS THE THING WHICH THEY VOTED TO PASS?!

  2. They do introduce bills like that, all the time. A recent one was 119th Congress "H. R. 12 - To protect a person’s ability to determine whether to continue or end a pregnancy, and to protect a health care provider’s ability to provide abortion services" which is mainly about women's right to choose but it also explicitly mentions the rights if LGBTQ healthcare as one of the casualties of the reversal of Roe V. Wade by Republican stacked SCOTUS. It was never called to vote by the Republican Speaker of the House. Link Here: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/12/text

The problem with arguing with you people is it's easier for you to ask these questions and make random shit up than it is for me to provide this evidence. I hope you left this conversation more informed than you entered it because otherwise it's just been a waste of time.

All that isn't to say that people shouldn't vote for a corporate dem when it's that or a republican, but you're completely blind if you can't see that there are real problems with the party that are contributing to their losses.

People, including YOU, are contributing to the problems we face by coming in here with no other purpose than to shit "constructive criticism" all over the Democrats. The next election won't be decided by whose policies are the best or worst, it won't be decided by those of us who want to make the party better and are taking actions towards that goal, what will decide the election is whether or not people are energized and excited to vote for the DNC like they were in 2020 and in 2008.

You can fix a minority party all you like, but what we need right now is to remove the GOP at any cost.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)
  1. Touche, though passing a constitutional amendment as the method is a pipe dream, and you'll have to forgive me for not really believing they mean it given how many of them are completely governed by special interests.
  2. They don't get credit for something they did 15 years ago and have completely backed off on.
  3. Ok why didn't that do that when they controlled the house? Oh yeah because it's something they only do to drive engagement and never act on when they can.
[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world -3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)
  1. Bodily autonomy was a protected right by the 14th Amendment as of the Roe V. Wade decision until in June 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned it. After it was overturned the DNC had control of the house until the 2022 midterm election but only narrowly held a 50:50 Senate WITH HELP OF CAUCUSING IND. Since abortion is a core policy stance for Republicans they would fillibuster it at ever opportunity and last I checked the 48 seats they had, the most they have held in over a decade, is less than 60 needed to bypass fillibuster. The DNC could change senate rules to remove fillibuster, but then the GOP still held more seats and the fact that Independents Manchin and Sinema are both the real moderates while Angus King does his own libertarian thing means they might have sided with the GOP on key legislatures, putting us in an even worse position than we are right now.
[–] Feyd@programming.dev 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Abortion rights (and everything else that was a constant campaign point for both the rs and ds) were hanging by a thread on supreme court decisions for years and years. They had decades to actually legislate them.

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world 0 points 21 hours ago

Perhaps if they had changed the filibuster rules in 2010 they could have done something about it. Otherwise, there have been no opportunities, we need more seats.