this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
279 points (97.9% liked)

People Twitter

7993 readers
1007 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not op, but it's actually easier to use the snipping tool hotkey, as it's one press, saves the photo and immediately copies to my clipboard

[โ€“] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That's literally one vs two clicks, and that's not as exact/precise as copying the image itself to the clipboard like you can via the context menu.

But that still doesn't explain why the post around the image was included. Why snip so far around the image. ๐Ÿซ 

[โ€“] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, ones still smaller than two, and when I'm snipping, I'm not precise, I get what I need and move on with my life, because believe it or not. I don't really care .

[โ€“] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, one[']s still smaller than two

Except I'm done after clicking "Copy image", which is only two clicks. You have to press a key combo to initiate snipping, then click to start snipping, then drag the cursor.

That's more work, buddy. ๐Ÿ’€

But since you don't care, I guess you don't need to optimize. ๐Ÿ˜‰ Carry on!

[โ€“] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Why are you getting upset? I'm just explaining my process