this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
111 points (87.2% liked)

Technology

74461 readers
2421 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
111
AI can find cancer pathologists miss (www.uu.se)
submitted 2 days ago by Pro@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world
51 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/36236133

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

it won't because it's an illusion of a test with unverifiable results.

Imagine this, you want to know if you have cancer. you can get results from a biopsy, blood tests, and an MRI. all results are validated by specialist review. it will take 3 months to collect and validate the results. OR, you can run all your tests above and have results in 24 hours but they aren't validated by a specialist.

so the question is, why does it take 3 months and how can we make it shorter without decreasing quality, validity, or consistency?

AI is not the answer.