this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
462 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

74736 readers
2551 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (39 children)

Well the article is about the platform potentially being fined 49M, so... whatever charge they're being fined for?

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (25 children)

Because they profited from his torture and subsequent death?

To your point though, they aren't responsible in the moral sense that you're implying. However, they committed a crime when they platformed, promoted and profited from it.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (24 children)

Do we REALLY want to have platforms deciding what content is and isn't acceptable for us, though? How is this different from the current controversy involving payment processors and their removal of content they find objectionable?

[–] SculptusPoe@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

People never think of that. They always clamor for censorship, always thinking censorship will go their way and censor the things they don't like. Since the police already went to where this guy was and determined that he was there of his own volition, I don't think the streaming services should have any other responsibility. The streaming services should always err on the side of not censoring anything.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why should they err on that side again?

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because we don't want them censoring anything they find objectionable. Like porn. Or abortion material. Or LGBT stuff. Need I go on?

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Almost every website has a TOS and censors some stuff against said terms. You act like its not already nornal to have standards for conduct.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

some stuff against said terms

Like mastercard and their ban of all purchases of items that could reflect negatively on their brand. Like porn.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

I think platforms can dissallow some unreasonable content without 3rd parties trying to police all porn

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)