this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
268 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

74461 readers
3005 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 5 points 24 minutes ago

Is it just my ADHD, or did the article completely fail to mention why a streamer was forced by two other streamers to stay awake and ingest poison? Did they hold his family for ransom or something? I need context.

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

What changed between the 'months of torture' and Naruto and Safine being arrested, and the '10 days ' leading up to his death?

It sounds sick that the French government would decide a man is being tortured yet they're not obligated to intervene... while at the same time they fine a company for not stepping in.

If this man was negligently killed, authorities and kick are to blame, but it's the authorities that should've been the failsafe, not the company. I guess it makes sense that French politicians are Very Mad™ and Seriously Considering Bigger Punishments™.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Exactly the autorities should be help accountable too

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Can someone point that out the part where this wasn't voluntary or the guy was held captive & not free to leave or end the voluntary abuse at any time?

It looks like idiots kink-playing too hard with extra fines to some platform while the morons try to escape accountability.

Viral compilation threads have shown Pormanove being hit, strangled, and fired at with paintball guns while streaming with Naruto and Safine, whose lawyers claim they hold “no responsibility.”

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The autority should be held accountable too since they opened an investigation but did not force the streamers to temporarly stop streaming till the investigation is finished

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I don't think that's a real issue. depending on how long this investigation goes, that would either be meaningless loss of revenue for these content creators, or an easy way to destroy the career of any other content creators too if a disgruntled viewer reports them falsely.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 37 minutes ago (1 children)

The investigation started in December 2024, the abusers was taken into custody then released unconditionally so i don't see how the authorities are not responsible too  

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 29 minutes ago

ok, that's a different reason now, I can agree with that. maybe it shouldn't be legally possible to consent to abuse like that. but a law forbidding that could have far reaching consequences, like if a medical treatment is very painful but it cannot be avoided because painkillers have alimited effect

[–] CatsGoMOW@lemmy.world 28 points 6 hours ago

This is straight out of Black Mirror S7E1 and the idea behind the “Dum Dummies” site. 😭

[–] Womble@piefed.world 172 points 9 hours ago (24 children)

The title kinda buries the lede there. I thought it was ridiculous to fine a platform just because a streamer happened to die on camera, but no, they were streaming months long abuse and torture of this guy at the hands of his co-streamers.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

By how it reads, it kind of looks like more of a Jack-ass situation if voluntary abuse. There was some mention of him getting shot with paint balls. Also, the autopsy report said he had no trauma.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Physical trauma maybe

[–] idntknow@lemmy.world 109 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

It is insane how it is even possible to live stream the torture of someone for months without any law enforcement getting involved.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 hours ago

It’s similar to fear factor—you can authorize quite a lot of things in a contract.

The medical examiner has said that they don’t think his death was caused directly by the treatment during the stream.

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 32 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It’s all over the place on Facebook and Twitter though. There’s dog fighting, cock fighting, monkey abuse showing up on my Facebook home feed every now and then. This shouldn’t be a surprise really.

[–] GlenRambo@jlai.lu 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Thats just like, your algorithm man. -Labowskie

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I’d love to know why an algorithm shows me this stuff as I don’t look any of it up. It’s quite traumatic to see. It’s the reason I don’t use these social media apps anymore. They’re all suggested posts and it’s an assault.

[–] GlenRambo@jlai.lu 1 points 25 minutes ago

Generally it shows us content that makes us mad. Sadly, and opposite to what we thibk, humans are more likely to engage with content thst pisses us off. Maybe it took things too far with yours. Possibly you commented on how fucked up one post was so it showed you more. Dunno.

[–] TheMcG@lemmy.ca 47 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

They kinda did. The dudes were taken in as part of an ongoing investigation but were then released. I can see why it’s fared for the cops when even the victims are saying it’s by their own choice. But it’s no excuse for kick.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/sci-tech/article/outcry-over-french-streamers-death-on-air-as-authorities-probe-allegations-of-abuse/

The investigation, opened in December, is looking into “deliberate violence against vulnerable persons” and “spreading recordings of images related to offences involving deliberate violations of physical integrity,” Martinelli’s statement said. It did not specify why Pormanove could be considered vulnerable.

The statement said two co-streamers allegedly involved in the case were briefly taken into custody in January but were released pending further investigation.

In parallel, the Nice prosecutor said, investigators interviewed Pormanove and one of his co-streamers who both appeared to be victims of violence and humiliation. They “strongly denied being victims of violence, stating that the events were staged in order to `generate a buzz’ and make money.”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

If that is the case then I'd like to see how aware they were of what was happening. I'd push for criminal charges against management in that case.

[–] oozynozh@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 hours ago

Kick CEO was a top 5 donor to the channel in question. Not only did they know, they actively encouraged it.

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›