this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
589 points (99.0% liked)
Technology
74532 readers
4099 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Not OC but I don't want to deal with Nvidia's proprietary drivers. AMD cards "just work" on Linux
Except that AMD doesn't support HDMI 2.1 on Linux (not their fault to be fair, but still)
Is that the case on mobile APUs as well? I'm pretty sure my laptop with 7840u does 4k120hz
This may be an unpopular opinion but who cares? I'll use DVI if I have to.
I personally don't have a need for it, but if someone has a 4K 120Hz TV or monitor without DisplayPort that they want to use as such, it's kinda stupid that they can't.
yeah, but that's the fault of the HDMI standards group. AMD cards could only support HDMI 2.1 if they closed their driver down. I guess this can't be fixed with a DP to HDMI adapter either, right?
my opinion: displayport is superior, and if I have a HDMI-only screen with supposed 4k 120Hz support I treat it as false info.
Intel cards do, I think, so that's a non-NVIDIA option.
yeah intel (⊙_◎)
That's completely valid, I haven't had issues on Linux myself with nvidia, but I know it's definitely a thing for a lot of people.