this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
600 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

74532 readers
3798 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/36378173

Comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 100 points 1 day ago (23 children)

I’d prefer an AMD 9000 series because I refuse to support Nvidia, but the upgradability is still an amazing achievement. I’m glad to see Framework delivering.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (17 children)

Out of curiosity, why do you refuse to support Nvidia? AMD isn't some saint, they're a shitty corporation just like Nvidia. They got lucky when Jim Keller saved their asses with the Ryzen architecture in the mid-2010s. They haven't really innovated a god damn thing since then and it shows.

Edit: I get it, I get it, Nvidia is a much shittier company and I agree. I was pretty drunk last night before bed, please pardon the shots fired

[–] ElectroLisa@piefed.blahaj.zone 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not OC but I don't want to deal with Nvidia's proprietary drivers. AMD cards "just work" on Linux

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Except that AMD doesn't support HDMI 2.1 on Linux (not their fault to be fair, but still)

[–] i_am_hiding@aussie.zone 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This may be an unpopular opinion but who cares? I'll use DVI if I have to.

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I personally don't have a need for it, but if someone has a 4K 120Hz TV or monitor without DisplayPort that they want to use as such, it's kinda stupid that they can't.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

yeah, but that's the fault of the HDMI standards group. AMD cards could only support HDMI 2.1 if they closed their driver down. I guess this can't be fixed with a DP to HDMI adapter either, right?

my opinion: displayport is superior, and if I have a HDMI-only screen with supposed 4k 120Hz support I treat it as false info.

[–] naitro@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Is that the case on mobile APUs as well? I'm pretty sure my laptop with 7840u does 4k120hz

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Intel cards do, I think, so that's a non-NVIDIA option.

[–] bluecat_OwO@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

yeah intel (⁠⊙⁠_⁠◎⁠)

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

That's completely valid, I haven't had issues on Linux myself with nvidia, but I know it's definitely a thing for a lot of people.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)