this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
416 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

74902 readers
2152 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

3% may not sound much but this is on revenue, not profit.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well... Taxes are not unified, trade policy is supposed to be. So this is kinda gray area as it is a tax affecting trade specifically. But VAT kinda gives the precedence that countries can tax foreign company business.

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah but my understanding was that an important part of the EU is the negotiation of trade deals that regulate tariffs, and that the countries more or less gave their sovereignty in that area to the EU. Maybe I was mistaken?

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Again, what is the difference between a tariff and a tax? Tariffs don't apply to domestic companies, while taxes do. EU controls tarrifs, but not taxes. This tax technically applies to all companies, domestic or foreign above certain revenue, although in reality, there are no domestic companies it would affect.

So it is a tax, not a tariff by a technicality. It may even be the case that a court will strike this law down, saying they can't pretend it is a tax when it is clearly meant to tax only foreign tech giants.