this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
583 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

74532 readers
3964 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/36378173

Comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

What are you talking about? Of course there is newer hardware than a Radeon RX 7700. The 7900 specifically.

The CPU also has no Ryzen 395 option either which Framework source for their unmodular desktop PC.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

The 7900 is not newer

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

The 7900 specifically.

They have to stay within the TDP. Their only option is something newer and ~100W (like the 5070).

And I'm pretty sure the 7000 series is going out of production anyway...

Also (while no 395 is disappointing), it is a totally different socket/platform, and the 395 has a much, much higher effective TDP, so it may not even work in the Framework 16 as its currently engineered. For instance, the cooling or PSU just may not be able to physically handle it. Or perhaps there's no space on the PCB.