this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
316 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25507 readers
2573 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Monarez 's ouster, less than one month after the Senate confirmed her to the role, was followed by resignations from three other top CDC officials in protest of Kennedy's leadership.

The White House said it fired Susan Monarez, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, after she refused to step down from her post amid a policy disagreement with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

The termination, confirmed late on Aug. 27 by the White House, came after her attorneys denied she had resigned or received notification of her termination, even after HHS announced earlier in the day that Monarez was no longer the CDC director.

Monarez's ouster, less than one month after the Senate confirmed her to the role, was followed by resignations from three other top CDC officials in protest of Kennedy's leadership, including his direction on vaccines.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 1 week ago (17 children)

Meanwhile the entire "wellness" industry is applauding Kennedy et al.

Of all the shit these guys are shovelling this vaccine stuff has the greatest potential for harm IMO.

It's going to be a very bitter feeling when the idiocy of these measures is revealed by the body count.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 52 points 1 week ago (15 children)

Every one of them will happily trade your health for their own profit.

Return the favor when they start dying en mass.

[–] Suspiciousbrowsing@kbin.melroy.org 27 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah, except the cost to the vulnerable or those that rely on herd immunity. Nothing quite like bringing back effectively eradicated diseases.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Perhaps this is what the 2nd Amendment was for.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The 2nd Amendment was created to ensure schoolchildren have to live in constant fear.

[–] tmyakal@infosec.pub 5 points 1 week ago

Nothing so nefarious as that. Just like a lot of the Constitution, it was to help maintain chattel slavery.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah it's definitely I'm going to be treated like the flu, with yearly reformulated shots eventually.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Except it's not, because they're working towards outlawing covid vaccines entirely. Allegedly a new one is going to be available this year (it's already late), but as they continue to consolidate power I think it's likely they refuse to approve next year's at all.

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh yeah

I'm in Canada, we've made the latest one, we're going to use them.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are 6 vaccine production facilities across canadian universities coming online this year, across the country. We are bringing back the expertise killed off by the Mulroney Conservatives.

Makes me really glad that America's fall to fascism came in the form of a double-tap. Trump's first term showed us that things were deeply fucked, but since there were a few years of Biden in between we had time to prepare for the second.

[–] unconsequential@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This. It may not cost them their children or loved ones but it can cost someone else’s theirs. It’s socially irresponsible and reckless. Unfortunately, unless it’s suddenly them whose effected directly they won’t care. The whole “it’ll never happen to me” but if it does, then they’ll come out crying and a pleading on tv. I wish people could just consider others wellbeing for more than two seconds. Yes, your personal independence is important but you don’t live in a vacuum! You’re a social animal and that comes with responsibilities.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

It was socially irresponsible and reckless to ignore warnings about COVID-19 from Asia. But when Trump was infected, he had the latest tech from the NIH to keep him alive.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)