this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
556 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

74073 readers
2765 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
556
Starlink tries to block Virginia’s plan to bring fiber Internet to residents (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 day ago by drmoose@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
143 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Starlink operator SpaceX is fighting Virginia's plan to deploy fiber Internet service to residents, claiming that federal grant money should be given to Starlink instead. SpaceX is already in line to win over $3 million in grant money in the state but is seeking $60 million.

Starlink is poised to benefit from the Trump administration rewriting rules for the $42 billion Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) grant program. While the Biden administration decided that states should prioritize fiber in order to build more future-proof networks, the Trump administration ordered states to revise their plans with a "tech-neutral approach" and lower the average cost of serving each location.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

That doesn't change the fact that he's an American citizen. That's what I was correcting.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, so the government doesn't kidnap or murder citizens now?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not sure how that's relevant. The OP claimed he wasn't a citizen, I corrected that.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

No, said it was foreign or internatuonal or something.

Which it is.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

International implies he's not a citizen, which he is.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

No it does not. It implies activity in and from ither places as well as this one. Which it is.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works -1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's not how these words work.

I get that you don't like Elon Musk, and that's completely fair. But that doesn't make it okay to just change the meaning of words so it can fit your narrative, whatever that means.

If Elon Musk commits an act of terrorism, he would be a domestic terrorist. That's how words are defined.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago

how words work

Oh language barrier. I omly know english and kiiiinda spanish, sorry.