this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
930 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

77084 readers
2643 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 7 points 1 day ago (14 children)

Self driving cars are a great idea, but they aren’t a fix everything solution, they just one part of an overall solution.

Why are they a great idea? What are they making better? How is it worth the real and opportunity costs?

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (10 children)

They're safer than human drivers. Tesla cars absolutely are not. But Waymo cars? They do seem to be.

https://www.npr.org/2025/12/12/nx-s1-5634879/why-one-trauma-doctor-sees-self-driving-cars-as-a-public-health-breakthrough

It's still early. We still need more data. They should be closely watched. But self driving cars do appear to be safer. That's why they are a great idea. They are making driving and roads better.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I don't have the means or motivation to do research now from the couch, so I'll concede you may be correct. However, I think it might be even safer to take those same billions of dollars and invest them in mass transit and other infrastructure changes. That would mean fewer car accidents, less pollution, nicer spaces, healthier people, healthier economies, etc. private car ownership cannot be the long term solution. If it's not an outright dead end, it's certainly a side street instead of high speed rail (if you'll pardon a strained metaphor).

[–] johntash@eviltoast.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While I'd absolutely love better and more public transit, it just doesn't make sense in a lot of areas that are too spread out or don't have enough people per square mile.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 23 hours ago

So leave that problem for later. Let them keep driving themselves, and focus on improvements where people actually live.

Most people live in or close to cities.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)