this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
540 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

74799 readers
2658 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 100 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I don't want 8K. I want my current 4K streaming to have less pixilation. I want my sound to be less compressed. Make them closer to Ultra BluRay disc quality before forcing 8K down our throats... unless doing that gives us better 4K overall.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 37 points 2 days ago

Yeah 4K means jack if it’s compressed to hell, if you end up with pixels being repeated 4x to save on storage and bandwidth, you’ve effectively just recreated 1080p without upscaling.

Just like internet. I’d rather have guaranteed latency than 5Gbps.

[–] Geometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyz 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yep, just imagine how bad the compression artefacts will be if they double the resolution but keep storage/network costs the same.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Doubling the dimensions make it 4x the data.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 7 points 2 days ago

That's not true for compressed video. It doubles the bitrate for the same quality on modern codecs (265, av1, etc.)

[–] IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Not if you only double it in one direction. Checkmate.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Increasing resolution but keeping the same bitrate still improves the image quality, unless the bitrate was extremely low in the first place. Especially with modern codecs

20mbps 4k looks a lot better than 20mbps 1080p with AV1

[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bingo, if I were still collecting DVDs/HD DVDs like I was in the 90's, it might be an issue. Streaming services and other online media routed through the TV can hardly buffer to keep up with play speed at 720, so what the fuck would I want with a TV that can show a higher quality of picture which it can also not display without stutter-buffering the whole of a 1:30:00 movie?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -2 points 2 days ago

Streaming services and other online media routed through the TV can hardly buffer to keep up with play speed at 720

This is a problem with your internet/network, not the TV.