this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2025
779 points (99.2% liked)

People Twitter

7949 readers
777 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tja@programming.dev -1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Have you ever had an open book exam?

[–] BlackRoseAmongThorns@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Open books exams are bounded by time, something an AI has plenty of, ridiculously more than a person, to say it's giving them an advantage is missing the absurdity of the situation as it also had much more time to train and "study", and yet it produces the results it does.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

What results? We are assuming it passes med school, so the result must be good.

[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The OP is rage bait, all 5 big exams on the path to becoming a doctor are proctored with no electronics allowed. Being caught cheating at any one of those guarantees expulsion (For the USMLE) or never being admitted in the first place (MCAT) or never being licensed in a specialty (Board exam).

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 3 hours ago

Interesting, thanks.

[–] BlackRoseAmongThorns@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The results people get from prompting current models, which hallucinate, a lot, and that's not really a fixable issue

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

So then ChatGPT wouldn't pass the exam, nothing to worry about.