this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2025
896 points (99.0% liked)

People Twitter

8280 readers
1310 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlackRoseAmongThorns@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Open books exams are bounded by time, something an AI has plenty of, ridiculously more than a person, to say it's giving them an advantage is missing the absurdity of the situation as it also had much more time to train and "study", and yet it produces the results it does.

[–] Tja@programming.dev -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What results? We are assuming it passes med school, so the result must be good.

[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The OP is rage bait, all 5 big exams on the path to becoming a doctor are proctored with no electronics allowed. Being caught cheating at any one of those guarantees expulsion (For the USMLE) or never being admitted in the first place (MCAT) or never being licensed in a specialty (Board exam).

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Interesting, thanks.

[–] BlackRoseAmongThorns@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The results people get from prompting current models, which hallucinate, a lot, and that's not really a fixable issue

[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So then ChatGPT wouldn't pass the exam, nothing to worry about.