this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
56 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10902 readers
1316 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (16 children)

Canada is actively looking at potential alternatives to the U.S.-built F-35 stealth fighter and will hold conversations with rival aircraft makers, Defence Minister Bill Blair said late Friday, just hours after being reappointed to the post as part of Prime Minister Mark Carney's new cabinet.

The remarks came one day after Portugal signalled it was planning to ditch its acquisition of the high-tech warplane.

The re-examination in this country is taking place amid the bruising political fight with the Trump administration over tariffs and threats from the American president to annex Canada by economic force.

There has been a groundswell of support among Canadians to kill the $19-billion purchase and find aircraft other than those manufactured and maintained in the United States.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago (7 children)

It feels like going through with the F35 purchase is becoming politically untenable.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago (5 children)

hard to justify buying weapons from a country threatening to invade you unless you're Europe

[–] digitalFatteh@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not to mention the possibility of a kill switch the can turn it all off and effectively make it useless for defence.

[–] hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's not so much a kill switch as the F-35 being a hangar queen, needing a steady and constant supply of parts and software updates. That itself is a good reason to reconsider the purchase, though.

[–] IndridCold@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

F-35 being a hangar queen

Hanger Queen was always my favourite ABBA song.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

There is nothing this technologically advanced that the manufacturers cant brick or severely impair if pushed to do so (if not by remote command, then by support neglect), and you can be guaranteed the Americans know of remote vulnerabilities as well. Thats a given. We can 100% expect they would be tarmac bricks within weeks of the USA breaking hard from NATO or Canada.

Fyi, they could also brick nearly every modern large tractor in the country right at harvest season, and most of our street vehicles. All via standard remote update infrastructure.

Thats just the reality of modern tech. It would be the same with other options, but we should pick a country not threatening to annex us to buy from.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

that is a Reddit rumor. there is no physcial "kill switch", it's a metaphor for dependence on US sold parts.

Anything we buy made in the US is an effective "kill switch".

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)