this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
1253 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

74153 readers
3781 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mintiefresh@piefed.ca 217 points 1 day ago (14 children)

Honestly, good on him.

More people should do the same.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 105 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

He took a principled stance when he left Spotify too, after they paid hundreds of millions for Joe Rogan's podcast.

Edit: Disappointingly, it turns out he went back to Spotify after a couple of years.

[–] ArgentRaven@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure his label put his stuff back on there, despite his wishes. I seen to remember a need article at the time describing his reaction as "disappointed". Not all of his stuff is back on there, but I guess the stuff he didn't have full control over is.

Personally, I don't listen to Joe Rogan, but I do listen to Neil Young. And Spotify is the way I typically listen to anything since they killed the SD Card on most mobile phones. So it hurt me, and I assume it hurts anyone who would want to listen to both and only gets the option of Joe Rogan. So I think having access to media is better, but I'm not the artist and I get taking a moral stance.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think the aim is to get people to switch to a more ethical streaming service, if they want to stream music. Spotify isn't the only option.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

If you're into self hosting (or have a friend who is), I've found Navidrome (music hosting) and Substeamer app to be great open source alternatives.

[–] sean_lemmy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Substreamer appears to be free but not open source

[–] TheFinn@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 18 hours ago

Tempo I believe is free and open source

[–] takenaps@lemmy.world 17 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Yo fyi I recently dropped spotify for Tidal & loving it

[–] ArgentRaven@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

I tried tidal about two years ago and they had even less of what I listen to than Spotify. But maybe I should check in again and see what's different, because nothing stays the same for long.

[–] Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf 3 points 11 hours ago

If you don't want to support an American company, you could also try Qobuz.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 9 points 21 hours ago

Yeah check again. It's pretty comprehensive now and it has not yet been littered with AI songs. Only issue I have is sometimes songs in my Playlist will no longer be licensed with them and can't play anymore which is frustrating but rare. Aufio quality is better than Spotify.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)