this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
1176 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

74153 readers
3675 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] roserose56@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Once again like others said, drop Facebook! Lots of fake profiles, scam ads and miss information.

[–] Logical@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

If Miss Information gets married, does she become Mrs Information?

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 2 points 50 minutes ago

Thats Ms Information

[–] roserose56@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

Lol good one!

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 2 points 49 minutes ago

He did the same thing on spotify and a little while later all his songs (at least the ones I had in my playlists) were back.

I feel like more people should know what’s going on. Facebook has done some scummy stuff in the past. Now Zuck is openly defending his AI grooming children. In and of itself it doesn’t make a lot of sense — what’s the upshot for Meta here? But outside the bubble of logic, it sets kids up to be groomed by real predators. It’s unacceptable.

People say the problem is that all the people they know are on Facebook. Two issues: most of those people would forget you exist if you leave Facebook. Also, you’re the reason they’re there. The second reason is that you are literally the product. You being on Facebook is part of the reason those people are, too, so be the change you want to see in the world.

[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

How are people still on Facebook, I dropped it the moment my parents made Facebook accounts and that was before all the horrible stuff about the cokpany even came out I think

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

Please somebody tell him about mastodon and lemmy.

[–] Dayroom7485@lemmy.world 16 points 7 hours ago

So based 🙏

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 10 hours ago

Once again, Neil Young reminds us that he has a gargantuan penis.

[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world 45 points 14 hours ago

Neil Young and Dolly Parton

Role models we need but don't deserve

[–] mintiefresh@piefed.ca 212 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Honestly, good on him.

More people should do the same.

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 21 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The way people turned up their nose at the Fediverse when the Muskening happened to Twitter was heartbreaking. I knew social media was an addiction but when you find out your dealer is an absolute monster how do you not go looking for a new supplier?

But they all discarded Mastodon et al as cringe and teduoust. Like, the way even trans women influencers stayed on Twitter blew my mind. When bluesky got off the ground there was finally some migration, but not enough.

It really showed me how many of the "anti-capitalist" and the "anarchism" and "mutual aid" people were all just talk. The mutual-aid volunteer-based platform exists and you stuck with the fascist because it was easy and you're too cool for the nerd shit.

[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

I gotta say, I was among the Twitter Marxist crowd around 3 years ago,and yeah most are just talk, yap and argue, although there were some genuinely making something good, such as a community library or benches for instance. I'd say none of them would switch to the fediverse in any actual capacity, because most just believe in the asthetics and being in the community of like-minded people, instead of actually following the values they allegedly preach, but really don't even know.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 103 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

He took a principled stance when he left Spotify too, after they paid hundreds of millions for Joe Rogan's podcast.

Edit: Disappointingly, it turns out he went back to Spotify after a couple of years.

[–] ArgentRaven@lemmy.world 67 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure his label put his stuff back on there, despite his wishes. I seen to remember a need article at the time describing his reaction as "disappointed". Not all of his stuff is back on there, but I guess the stuff he didn't have full control over is.

Personally, I don't listen to Joe Rogan, but I do listen to Neil Young. And Spotify is the way I typically listen to anything since they killed the SD Card on most mobile phones. So it hurt me, and I assume it hurts anyone who would want to listen to both and only gets the option of Joe Rogan. So I think having access to media is better, but I'm not the artist and I get taking a moral stance.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 27 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I think the aim is to get people to switch to a more ethical streaming service, if they want to stream music. Spotify isn't the only option.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] takenaps@lemmy.world 17 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Yo fyi I recently dropped spotify for Tidal & loving it

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 25 points 19 hours ago

I quit 10yrs ago. I am almost 70. If this old fart can do it. So can you.

[–] KurtVonnegut@mander.xyz 42 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

What is up with these CAPS? Are we copying the typographic INCONTINENCE of Trump?

[–] j4yt33@feddit.org 3 points 6 hours ago

Quite a normal thing to do no? Way before Trump got elected

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 18 points 15 hours ago

typographic incontinence

This term tickled my linguizzle gland.

[–] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 23 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

I have noticed people have changed the way they type since around 2016, when trump became president. The amount of people putting "Sad." Behind a sentence is mindblowing. He gave so many people severe brainworms.

[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Oh that is not all. Future generations might be able to map all the brain rot that man has caused.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 24 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Using caps for emphasis in places where formatting options don’t exist is a practice as old as the internet. I remember doing it in the usenet days.

[–] derek@infosec.pub 5 points 7 hours ago

It's a practice at least as old as type itself. It seems the attention Trump garnered, and the highlighting of his stereotypical Boomer typing, have merged the two in some people's minds.

We're at a unique crossroad where Gen X and Y grew up with their grandparents mostly refusing to use cell phones and their parents mostly fumbling with them. Now Gen Z and "Alpha" are growing up with grandparents who have mostly been shamed into acceptable text etiquette, and parents who are mostly as tech savvy as the next parent and who were there when the deep magic was written (so to speak).

Mango Mussolini's narcissism is as pervasive as his parasitism so it's no wonder the lecherous rapist's sins against modern digital convention survived along with him. Some spin that as brilliant tactics but I'm not so sure. I'd wager it's a coincidence he leaned into because it garnered attention.

Most of those now driving online discourse hadn't had the same exposure to that style of texting prior to the 2016 US Presidential election cycle as preceding generations. So it seems novel to them. It's history and perspective bring formed in real time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I think a lot of that started ironically and then bled over to normal conversations.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

I think it's still mostly used ironically. Though, it's hard to know anymore. I know it is among my social circles, at least.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 10 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

With a single word in caps like that, I read it as yelling the word loudly.

The way it's used here, by a PR conscious intermediary, it comes across more like bitter sarcasm. Like he would not let them release the statement on his behalf unless they yelled Facebook's name when calling them out. It is similar to when a child tells their sibling they aren't allowed to do something, but they say it loudly enough so that everybody understands the parent in the next room hears it too.

Edit to clarify: It is an awesome move to call them out, especially to people who blindly just use Meta's stuff. I read my own comment and worried it would sound like I was calling the Facebook call-out childish itself. It is not. It is a very good thing to fight for a better world, especially when you have the fame or resources that give you a louder voice.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 70 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

ted nugent decided to use facebook even more for the same reason

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 22 points 20 hours ago

Oh, is Ted having trouble finding jailbait these days?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 54 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

On the one hand, that's good, but on the other hand, Meta crossed my line over eight years ago, and I'm woefully disappointed that he was using it until this point.

[–] mitch@piefed.mitch.science 32 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I guess, but you will lead a lonely life if you can't find common struggle with people in different scenarios than our own. We can easily lose our soul with these endless purity tests — for some reason, Leftists, progressives, and liberals seem to be constantly on the lookout for the next Jesus Christ, who will just simply energize voters by consequence of, I dunno, magic or some shit.

Neil Young is still a working musician who needs to get his face and music in front of as wide and as general of an audience as possible — why wouldn't they be where people are? That's what makes this stand so important. Homie needs Facebook and Insta and still said no.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 22 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Didn't have to look far for that heart of gold, seems he already had it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ThillyGooth@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago

Good on him. I'm going to make it a point to listen to more Neil Young.

load more comments
view more: next ›