this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
161 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

75041 readers
2935 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] egrets@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, but it's OpEx, so it's just imaginary expenditure.

[–] boatswain@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I've heard this before but I still can't wrap my head around why some money counts and some doesn't

[–] Flisty@mstdn.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

@boatswain @egrets same as firing staff only to use more expensive contractors to do the same job, or selling a building you own only to rent the same building from someone else. It doesn't come from the same budget line, because it's lower risk, in the sense that you could in theory just stop paying the money if your strategy/situation changes, and you won't have ongoing expenses just from "owning" the thing. In reality you're usually still locked in, just paying more.

[–] boatswain@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago

Still seems like voodoo to me

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Creative business accounting.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Because it's someone else's fault.