this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
117 points (88.7% liked)

Technology

74994 readers
2854 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Damarus@feddit.org 4 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

You can hear a difference between 320 kbps mp3/aac/vorbis and lossless? Can you prove that with an ABX test?

[–] Dempf@lemmy.zip 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I notice the difference with an ABX test. Spent about $700 or so on my audio equipment, so I guess it is "budget" in the audiophile world.

[–] Damarus@feddit.org 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

What equipment do you have? My main setup is a Motu M4 with two Adam Audio T5V and multi point room correction done in REW. For headphones I'm mostly using DT 770 Pro 80 Ohm (there's different drivers depending on the impedance and these sound warmer). I also have a sizeable collection of IEMs with ratings up to a B on the crin list.

I can hear sounds up to about 16k. I'm allergic to bad audio. I cannot differentiate good lossy encodes from lossless audio.

[–] mateofeo85@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Eh, I got 40% on 2 tries. It’s something I guess. Either way, why not take the higher quality version if it’s included?

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 3 points 20 hours ago

So quite literally worse than a coin flip, then.

Streaming lossless audio will use up three to six times as much data, along with the higher processing demands to play them back, so there's always a penalty involved. We didn't invent codecs for no reason.

[–] Damarus@feddit.org 3 points 21 hours ago

So in other words you may as well have guessed randomly and gotten the same result. I'm against lossless streaming because my bandwidth is a limited resource and it will take longer to load the same track with higher bitrate. As there is no audible difference, there is also no practical reason to choose it.