this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2025
212 points (98.6% liked)

politics

25238 readers
2480 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Republican voters: “but you’re disenfranchising us!”

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I wish the abbreviation 'GOP' would stop being used as they aren't grand in any sense of the word.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 hours ago

Gang Of Paedos.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 28 points 14 hours ago

This is bad for everybody, but it would be worse to not do it. The G(rand)O(ld)P(edophiles) are destroying the country for no reason.

[–] ileftreddit@piefed.social 55 points 16 hours ago

Good, gerrymander the FUCK out of CA

[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 48 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I heard Arnold is against this. Same he didnt have the same response when texas was doing it.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 33 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

He is a "good republican". He dislikes trump because he lost influence but has no real problem with trump's america.

See also romney and the mccains.

[–] Microw@piefed.zip 9 points 10 hours ago

Arnie definitely has a personal problem with things like Trump's climate policy, his anti-immigrant policy and some other stuff. He has no problem with gerrymandering to favour the GOP though apparently, and still won't go on record against the GOP - only against Trump personally.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 34 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Which plan will they use? They could go 100% of districts being blue according to this:

It really sucks because RCV and proportional representation (using super districts) would solve so many problems—especially lesser of two evils voting. But is it better at this point to have as little MAGA representation as possible?

[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 44 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

They need to do the #2 Compact method. Then once there is a clear trifecta majority, they need to make a national law to eliminate gerrymandering nationwide. Take the power and then give it up, just like George Washington. That's the American way.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 16 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

It’s going to take generations to reverse this Nazi damage. If we ever regain our freedoms we need to make sure these Nazis are put in their place for the foreseeable future

[–] Gamechanger@slrpnk.net 6 points 11 hours ago

There is no "reversing" this. America is a failed society now.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 15 hours ago

I wish more states would do this and stop trying to play nice against people who aren't playing by the rules.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 15 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Good fuck Nazis they’re not welcome here. We need to stop paying federal taxes too.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Oh I'm in favor of California paying its fair percentage of net revenue, AFTER we've deducted all the expenses of replacing the clawed-back funds for necessary services. And the traditional "asshole customer surcharge." Should leave about $3.50

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeaaah, that map doesn't even look as fuckity as most red states but it's pretty clear to a CA native what they're doing to Bakersfield and Fresno areas. That northern district eating a bit into SF Bay area looks a little odd but I wouldn't have been surprised if that's how it's always been, lol.

Edit note: that one former gop speaker, what's-his-face comes from that Bakersfield area that's getting cut up.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Frankly speaking the dumb fucks up in Bakersfield got my uncle killed fuck em. Shitty ass infrastructure.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

It's true, but doesn't help that a ton of people living there also can't legally vote due to undocumented status. I imagine the land owners are the ones voting and yeah, fuck 'em.

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world -1 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

The Supreme Court will block this.

[–] moobythegoldensock@infosec.pub 2 points 6 hours ago

That’s the point. They’re trying to get the Republicans to back down.

[–] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

On what grounds?

According to the Constitution, maps will be drawn by the states. There is no national law against gerrymandering. The voting rights act only ensures that there are opportunity districts for minorities.

The only laws these maps violate are state laws and that will be alleviated by putting the action to a vote.

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago

On what grounds?

That it is bad for Republicans.

[–] elucubra@piefed.social 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That would probably be the best strategy, gerrymander the fuck out of a bunch of blue states, and have SCOTUS declare gerrymandering illegal

[–] cfi@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago

They'll find a way to make it only apply when it's against Republican interests.