this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
144 points (98.6% liked)

politics

26576 readers
1598 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At a recent press conference, a news correspondent asked White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt who selected Budapest, the home of right-wing leader Viktor Orbán, as the site for a meeting between United States President Donald Trump and Russian dictator Vladimir Putin. Leavitt’s reply was as concise as it was juvenile: “Your mom did.”

The fusion of imperial prerogative with adolescent snark is telling. There was no need to plant stories in the media about Budapest as a desirable site for a summit, or generate some pabulum rendering its status as a right-wing hotbed with a degree of plausible deniability: just “your mom.” No data, no warrants, no evidence, just a schoolyard jape. Yet, the comment contains a world.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Just another rancid apple from the basket of deplorables. Hillary was right.

[–] joshikyou@lemmings.world 23 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Bernie was right.

Hillary was an awful candidate and everyone who nominated her should feel blame for why trump won in 2016.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 1 points 3 weeks ago

Sorry, no. 2016 was the Before Times, until the “grab them by the pussy” tape came out and nothing came of it.

That would have been a political career ending coffin nail at any other time. We’ve been in the upside down ever since.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca -1 points 3 weeks ago

Hillary was an awful candidate

... says anyone not focused on Hillary's career before the presidency.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hillary was right.

Inside Team Clinton’s year-long struggle to find a strategy against the opponent they were most eager to face.

So to take Bush down, Clinton’s team drew up a plan to pump Trump up. Shortly after her kickoff, top aides organized a strategy call, whose agenda included a memo to the Democratic National Committee: “This memo is intended to outline the strategy and goals a potential Hillary Clinton presidential campaign would have regarding the 2016 Republican presidential field,” it read.

“The variety of candidates is a positive here, and many of the lesser known can serve as a cudgel to move the more established candidates further to the right. In this scenario, we don’t want to marginalize the more extreme candidates, but make them more ‘Pied Piper’ candidates who actually represent the mainstream of the Republican Party,” read the memo.

Yeah, she was a real one-woman brain trust.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Still, for all the hand-wringing from the bothsidering bullshit artists and the clutching of the Civility Pearls for her saying that - she was right.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

the bothsidering bullshit artists

Hillary: "I'm going to dig my own grave. Get ready for me to fumble the bag so hard it plunges the country into a new Dark Age."

Liberal Democrats: "Yas Queen."

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think anyone (at least not here and definitely not me) is yas queen'ing Hillary. I have a lot of reasons to fault her for a great many things, but when people were calling for their fainting couches because she spoke frankly about the Confederates, I just had to laugh. I grew up around a metric shit-ton of deplorables.

I mean, you still see so-called centrists and alleged leftists going hysterical over the term deplorables. Of course the wingnut snowflakes pretended to be so offended, too, just like when Obama made his "bitter clingers" comment. The way the usual suspects queened out over Obama's statement was even funnier to me, since he was talking about the very state I grew up in and he was absolutely correct about that.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I mean, you still see so-called centrists and alleged leftists going hysterical over the term deplorables.

Do I? That's not the critique of the campaign I've seen leftists fixate on. Meanwhile, centrists still venerate and emulate her. Hell, the Harris campaign poached heavily from Hillary's 2016 team and adopted much of her "bring on board as many 'moderate Republicans' as you can" strategy.

I grew up around a metric shit-ton of deplorables.

There's this idea that people who disagree with you politically are sub-human. And then there's this consequential idea that "we need to win the sub-human voters" whenever you're down in the polls. The end result of these combined theories of politics is a liberal party that constantly flirts with fascism under the table, while denouncing it from the front-page.

Consequently, you have people in your party viewing you as a corrupt and compromised candidate while people in the opposition party see you as a huckster and your base as suckers you've gulled into support. This is, incidentally, how Republicans saw their own liberal candidates in 2016. And its a fact Hillary leveraged to spoil Bush and Kasich via media back channels.

What she didn't consider was the appeal of open and honest fascism when stacked up against two-faced neoliberal pandering. It cost her the race in 2016. And it cost her heir apparent the race eight years later.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The groomed spokeperson for the pedo admin? Weird?

[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Given how fast she now seems to be aging, she might catch up.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

I hope she looks like the cryptkeeper by the end of this term.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

10s of millions of Americans like this, love it even.

Scary times.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 3 weeks ago

This is a Scaramucci level answer. Hey. oh. im not tonguing my own clit over here.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I thought she texted the "your mom" thing. Did she say it behind that podium, too?