this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2025
401 points (99.3% liked)

politics

26576 readers
1532 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Oh, so it's okay the files are released in their entirety? Maybe this statement counts as an order to release the files.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 125 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

What he says and what he does is two DIFFERENT things.

He SAYS things to distract you from what he is DOING.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 72 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

“I dont care if the files get released” says man who happens to also be furiously shoving documents into paper shredder

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago

Who cares what time it is, I have a Rolex.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 80 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What happened to, "there aren't any epstein files, it was all a hoax by the radical left?"

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not real but if it is then it's a hoax and if it's not a hoax it's okay to fuck kids.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Because they're older kids, it's not pedophilia, right? Just gotta think of a new angle!

[–] potpotato@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

15 is basically 16 is basically 17 and de facto 18. Wham bam, case closed.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 weeks ago

Schröedinger's files!

[–] Una@europe.pub 62 points 2 weeks ago

Even better, just release them :3

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 52 points 2 weeks ago

He doesn't care?

Then tell us who bubba is!? Who'd you blow? Who's knob did you gobble? We're all dying to know, Mr. Doesn't Care.

[–] K3zi4@lemmy.world 47 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Thought they didn't exist, Donny boy?

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 48 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It's very simple...

He doesn't care if the files, which don't exist, get released, which he could do unilaterally, but he won't, since he doesn't care, because he's not in them, and they're a political hit job by the democrats, or they would be, if they were real, but they aren't.

Got it?

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He's tried every other argument, now he's trying reverse psychology again

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aarRJaay@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Demented old fool has forgotten he's in them

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nah. I'm sure he knows he's in them. He probably just thought he could tell one of his sycophants to remove or redact his name like they could just do a "find all" and delete. He probably thinks his name has been scrubbed.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago

They probably did that but it didn't match DONNI TEE which is how that email got released

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe the only part he was worried about getting out was him sucking a guy's dick

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why should he care if they prove he committed heinous crimes? Nothing is going to be done about it

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Sucking a guy's dick isn't a crime, but sex with a minor sure is.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He has already been convicted of multiple other felonies and doesn’t serve time. Why should this be any different?

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

I don't know that it would be, but he sure seems to think so. I think him trying so desperately to cover it up for so long has made it more damaging than it would have been if he'd just owned it when his cult was clamoring for the files to be released. He'd downplay it with his usual word salad, news articles would be written about how terrible it was, and nothing of consequence would happen to him. Now, though? It's not just about the horrendous crimes, but his betrayal of his conspiracy theorist cult. Maybe it would still amount to nothing, but he hasn't done himself any favors by alienating his cultists.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me how Trump will face repercussions for these crimes when he hasn't for any other crimes. Who is going to prosecute him? What is the plan if the files prove he committed heinous crimes? Since he's clearly immune to all consequences of crimes, I think he's more concerned about people thinking he's gay

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

IF anything happens to him, it will be because he has eroded the trust of his conspiracy theorist cult by trying to cover up his pedophilia more than the pedophilia itself. A lot of his power is derived from his cult, which the Republicans are terrified of alienating. If he loses enough of their support, Republicans won't be so hell-bent on protecting him at all costs. It's a big "if."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Which is what they just said?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Suuuure he doesn't care..

(That's why he's got Pam Bondi digging through them to find dirt on the Democrats.)

He's gotta act cool, no matter what..

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I'm 100% sure there are democrats in the files. However, the fact that they haven't released any den names or tried to prosecute any sure is interesting.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Would be difficult to use the actual documents to pick and choose only Democrats to prosecute while protecting Republicans. Might as well just make everything up at at that point.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

What I still don't get is why the dems didn't release the files when they could. We could have been freed from Trump and other pedophiles.

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 weeks ago

I’m assuming it’s most likely those files are also riddled with dems in them.

At this point, release the files and put everyone in them who’s guilty away. If they’re guilty of raping children castrate them.

America needs to rebuild its government from the ground up.

Death to pedophiles.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

For most of Biden's term they were sealed under court order. But that ended Jan 1st, so there was 20 days to issue the order.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Also Merrick Garland was the fucking AG.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

He thinks the ones his fbi has redacted are the ones we're gonna go with

[–] tym@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

hot take: drumpf has lived in fear of the day pootin releases his p(enis blowing) tape and secretly can't wait for the sweet release of death at the hands of the heir apparent. Any day now...

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 weeks ago

Translation: he really, really cares.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 11 points 2 weeks ago

After dodging this issue for over a year? Press X to doubt.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 weeks ago

That's not what he's telling his toadies in Congress

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago

gets punched in face

IT DUSNT HURRRT

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There are no consequences for anything that he’s done, so why would he care?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FrederikNJS@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The Narcissist's Prayer

  • That didn't happen.
  • And if it did, it wasn't that bad.
  • And if it was, that's not a big deal.
  • And if it is, that's not my fault.
  • And if it was, I didn't mean it.
  • And if I did, you deserved it.

by Dayna Craig

We're at line 3, it seems

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf 6 points 2 weeks ago

Good news everyone!

load more comments
view more: next ›