this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
183 points (97.9% liked)

politics

26585 readers
1866 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/39081380

Jon Queally
Nov 15, 2025

Echoing recent viral comments by music superstar Billie Eilish, Maine Democratic candidate for US Senate Graham Planter is also arguing that the existence of billionaires cannot be justified in a world where working-class people with multiple jobs still cannot afford the basic necessities of life.

In video clip posted Friday of a campaign event in the northern town of Caribou from last month, Platner rails against the “structures” of an economy in which billionaires with vast personal fortunes use their wealth to bend government—including the tax code—to conform to their interests while working people are left increasingly locked out of controlling their own destinies, both materially and politically.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

He's not wrong.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

These greedy fuckers won't even loose anything if they payed their workers a healthy wage, but they just want to hoard their wealth for whatever reason. Don't the realize society is more productive when people can afford to live?

[–] Maiq@piefed.social 15 points 2 weeks ago

It's not about money as much as it's about the power they can buy with it. When they look outside they only see an ocean of slaves to their wealth. People not being able to afford to live doesn't really concern them. They are trying their hardest to replace people with machines so they control all the wealth and the means of production leaving the mass populous helpless in perpetual destitute.

[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

These greedy fuckers won’t even loose anything if they payed their workers a healthy wage

They might cry havoc and loose the dogs of war, in an effort to suppress wages

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Are we talking about people with $1B in the bank, or people “worth $1B” though?

If you got rid of the stock market today, forgave all loans and capped property values, it would be interesting to see who is actually rich.

[–] Maiq@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You have a good point, most of these billionaires have most of their wealth tied up in loans, stock market and property. Their wealth is calculated speculation on the value of their assets not in physical dollars.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

It’s not even speculation on the value of their assets; in most cases, it’s speculation on the value of their speculation on someone else’s revenue growing power.

[–] etherphon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

If you got rid of the stock market today

If only.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, has calculated that Americans have $1.8 trillion in excess savings. Of that, he believes that more than half sits in households in the top 10 percent of the income.

There are

10 million (10,000,000) hundred thousands in a trillion, for people to make 100k a year and when these people make that much they will put it back into the economy making those billionaires more money.

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

What's the difference between a billion and a trillion?
About a trillion.

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

Well he already has a half trillion. So it would be 1.5 trillion.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The whole tattoo scandal might have ended up being a plus, it came to light too late to replace him so now he has to lean in hard or his chances are entirely gone.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

too late to replace him

United States Senate election in Maine, 2026

  • Filing deadline: March 15, 2026
  • Primary: June 9, 2026
  • General: November 3, 2026

We don't even have the full list of candidates he's running against yet (assuming he stays in).

[–] etherphon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Well how am I supposed to build my $500 million yacht so I can dicksize with the other big dogs? /s