this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
213 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

74994 readers
2600 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 99 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There wasn't even a slap on the wrist in that ruling.

[–] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

I liked googles response statement that they disagree with the ruling and are considering their next steps. You could hear the champagne bottles popping open in the background… and it was a written statement.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This tells you all you need to know about how “punitive” this ruling was

[–] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

To be fair anything short of selling chrome or breaking up the company would have a positive reaction. The possibility of losing chrome was priced in.

[–] LNRDrone@sopuli.xyz 39 points 1 week ago

Waiting for the Onion article "Google won't have to sell judge"

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

Pushing far-right influencers on YouTube finally paid off to them...

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago
[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 15 points 1 week ago
[–] wosat@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I never thought forcing Google to sell Chrome was a good idea. Most of the companies lining up to buy it were AI companies flushed with private equity money. Does anyone really think those companies would do a better job at protecting user privacy and avoiding monopolistic practices?

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

While I agree with you, I wished that Mehta would entertain the idea of spinning Chrome into an independent company, even though it is still unclear to me how a browser company can generate revenue, especially to pay the salaries of the army of engineers working on Blink.

Yeah, it would have steadily lost money until one of those same companies stepped in and bought it anyway.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I’d be happy for chrome to collapse and go away entirely.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 11 points 1 week ago

judge ~~rules~~ drools

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

crime is legal anyway