this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
209 points (99.1% liked)

Fuck AI

4728 readers
648 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 61 points 1 week ago

There is no wrong way to use it considering they want everyone hooked on it. So it's their fault. Under ZERO circumstances would I ever say an LLM company is ever in the clear for their LLM guiding people towards killing themselves, no matter what they claim.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 50 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If a teen can bypass safety measures on your software that easily then they don’t work 🤷‍♂️

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Erm… actually, teenagers bypass security measures better than most adults.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I doubt that's the case anymore. Sure, the "kid tech genius" trope had it's day from the 80s to early 2000s, but now not so much There was this window of time where the tech could work wonders but was hard to use and demanded a great deal of understanding to get that wondrous benefit. Older folks had no time to get used to it, but young people had nothing better to do.

Now tech is accessible enough that you don't need to understand it so well, so younger folks don't learn it as much. Time mucking with it now competes with essentially limitless video and text content.

The millennial/younger Gen x partially met that expectation (most of them also didn't really understand tech either, just the ones that did were pretty blatant), but not anymore.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago

‘That easily’ = having a conversation with it while suicidal, not trying to break it.

[–] bonenode@piefed.social 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

”Holding your phone wrong” moment?

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Chip_Rat@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

I find this particular argument strange:

"Dude had suicidal thoughts/machinations long before he used Chatgtp"

So.... You're saying that this person was in crisis for awhile, but managed to not kill himself UNTIL he used your service which helped him plan it?

How .. how is that a reasonable argument?

[–] LostWanderer@fedia.io 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Oh, that's not a lawsuit in the making...Ugh, I can't wait for AI to lose all its staunch supporters.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's not even real ai either, just generative machine learning that outputs what we think we like based on a prompt. No prompt, no response, not intelligent

[–] LostWanderer@fedia.io 16 points 1 week ago

Yeah, which is what really grinds my gears; people let these techbros get away with shaping the narrative about their dressed up LLMs that aren't ever going to be intelligent. LLMs themselves can be useful for stuff, but they will never be a swiss army knife that can be used for anything. True AI, is going to be the product of proper research and investment of effort from multiple disciplines; neuroscience, psychology, and other tech fields will need to work together to manifest something that is artificially intelligent.

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago

it is AI, just not "AGI" or whatever word that implies it's extremely capable of everything. We even call those algorithms that play chess "AI".

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz -1 points 1 week ago

Real AI was invented in the 70s and it's called expert systems

[–] ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh, that’s not a lawsuit in the making…

The article is talking about one of the ongoing lawsuits against the company.

[–] LostWanderer@fedia.io 7 points 1 week ago

My mistake, commenting on the internet while tipsy, is...A choice. I forgot to read this article.

[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I'm sure then it should be placed under the mature section of the app store, after proper age verification and proper and repeated warnings about how this app can get you killed. I'm sure it will be great for their business.

[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And they call AI a soulless machine..

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

God made man in his own image, something something...

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I don't know why you guys are complaining about falling into the mechanical looms, the rules clearly say to not do that.

[–] Wytch@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

"AI" is an exercise in ignoring Mary Shelley's warning.

That poor kid. My heart goes out to his family.

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I remember when this happened, I think i commented something like "While chatgpt enabled this behavior and these sorts of things will continue to happen, the parents needed to be more attentive especially to his internet behavior, this is on them just as much."

I still feel that way, but damn, this is such an idiotic take from openai. Chatgpt as far as im aware is still the biggest llm app, and it still has these issues.

"Its the boys fault for killing himself." What a truly powerful take from the world's dumbest company that enabled the act of suicide. Morons.

[–] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

Looks like we can thin our own herd now