It was the best of times. It was the blurst of times!?
People Twitter
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
It was the best of times, I was just thinking about it but I don't know if you want to go to the store or something else
It was the best of times to be honest with you and you are a good person to do it and you can get it from the material and the teaching is the same thing as the next
It was the best of times. It is the worst of times.
Microsoft Teams is always trying to autofill simple responses so I guess I'm gonna have to get creative when I would normally use a "Thanks" or a "Sounds good" etc lol
My friend and I screenshot our favorite reply suggestions
"Brb I have to take the shit of the century"
[screenshot of "Let me know how it goes!" or whatever
I like when all three responses go together
"Great! Let me know how it goes! Best of luck!"
"It was a dark and stormy night" has entered the chat
"Hmmm...." Backspace... Backspace...
"It was a bright and sunny day..."
"This is the worst vampire novel I've ever read."
S P A R K L E S
https://bookshop.org/p/books/sabella-tanith-lee/13457595?ean=9780756411008&next=t
Sabella by Tanith Lee.
Best vampire novel you never read.
The storm raged in the dark of night.
Works for code too
import math
def multiply_bad(a:int, b:int) -> int:
return a*b
def multiply_better(a:int, b:int) -> int:
return (-1 if a<0 else 1)*(-1 if b<0 else 1)*int(math.sqrt(a*a*b*b))
def multiply_perfect(a:int, b:int) -> int:
product = 0
negative = False
if a < 0:
a = -1*a
negative = not negative
if b < 0:
b = -1*b
negative = not negative
for i in range(a):
for j in range(b):
product += 1
if negative:
return -1*product
return product
Missed opportunity for an obfuscated recursive solution.
Damn you're right. I bet i could come up with a bullshit bitwise operator solution too
So many missed opportunities. 🙂
care to explain this to a pleb in laymen's terms?
Basically, "why cross the street when you can circle the block 4 times while walking backwards and end up at the same spot"?
It's a joke, the less predictable way is just a far worse way to solve the problem, with a few faults sprinkled in.
SavageBooks or HelloFutureMe, I forget which, has a video touching on this topic. I think the point is that you don't need to always be surprising, but your writing should be original.
Funnily enough, the newest ChatGPT is unlikely to be helpful here since it now overcorrects for nonsensical phrases that you would be unlikely to understand and even less likely to write. Really interesting article on this topic: https://futurism.com/gpt-5-literary-outputs
Mostly taken from: https://www.christoph-heilig.de/en/post/gpt-5-is-a-terrible-storyteller-and-that-s-an-ai-safety-problem
That's funny, I actually do this too, but never thought about it as an intentional procedure.
I am going to eat a cactus
I know you were going to type that.
writes a one way function
There is redundancy in language. We say my day was shit instead of 0xf1 and that's fine.