Reminds me of how after WW2 people stopped calling their kids Adolf or even changed their name Adolf into something else. I mean, I'm not saying Zuckerberg is literally Hitler or something, but it sure is funnily similar.
this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
490 points (97.1% liked)
Technology
74831 readers
2742 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Zuckerberg literally means sugar hill/mountain in German.
As an Austrian, this comment saying that 'Berg' translates to both hill and mountain explains a lot about what I've seen Germans refer to as Berg. To me it only means mountain.
Most of the time it does mean mountain. But I did hear it used for hill once, but that's it.
A LOT of the ones I've seen Germans refer to as that are hills to me, so maybe it's normal for some. The way we use it, Berg has to go over the tree line, or at the very least be steep enough at the top to not have vegetation there.
Yeah, isn't hill hügel/hüble? Currently hiking in DE and just climbed one and it had the signs, too. Now the real question is - at what point is it considered a mountain?
Our definition: either high enough or steep enough to have no vegetation at the top. For some people, only the former definition counts. But from experience, the definition must be different in Germany. Maybe someone from there can chime in to share their definition!
Same thing happened after WW1 too btw. The strong anti-German sentiments across the US and Europe prompted multiple changes. William and Vilhelm became Bills or Ville; Müller became Miller; Schmidt became Smith.
I had a lot of Swedish family who did this from around 1915-1930 and as you said, again after WW2.
What about John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt? Everyone seemed to share a name with him according to lore.
It's probably so popular on account of people always shouting it.
Hey! That's my name, too!
Going months at a time without his Facebook account for his legal practice has allegedly cost him thousands of dollars in advertising and communication with clients
Take a hint, get a professional website and don’t rely on Facebook to host your business.
You have to meet clients where they are. These days, clients are far less likely to find you if you only have a site with no social media presence.
I guess... But if your web presence is only on Facebook and that's the first result I see then .. hard pass
Even for companies that have sites, they often get more people contacting them through social media instead of their site. Social media sites tend to have better SEO.
That's especially the case for younger people as they search Instagram and TikTok more than Google. (https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoetsier/2024/03/11/genz-dumping-google-for-tiktok-instagram-as-social-search-wins/ ).
I understand this is a vector. I just find it a stupid one.
That's my daily battle. I'm looking for something in my country, and there are these "businesses" that only show on Facebook or Instagram, both of which are entirely blocked at the network and device level in my house. So I'll never do business with them. If you don't have an actual web site with relevant information, I just keep looking.
Demanding a small business has their own website before you do business with them is peak Lemmy.
This site is way out of touch with what the typical person has the knowledge or time to do.
You're absolutely correct. Most of us in Lemmy are far from being typical, which is why I love it here.
You're not wrong. Should it be different? Absolutely. Will it be different? Maybe someday in the distant future.
But ultimately what's most likely to happen is that the average person is going to keep pressing the dopamine buttons on their pocket rectangles and telling the world about every fart that exits their buttcheeks and if you don't do that you're going to get slowly pushed out of society in a similar way to the Amish or Mennonites.
It weirdly reminds me of the mark of the beast from the book of revelation. Apocalyptic literature does so well not because it predicts the future but because it follows the repeating patterns of the past. The world as humans know it has ended and been replaced by something new and utterly bizarre more times than history has recorded and will probably continue to do so more times than we can comprehend.
Each new version of humanity has people that get left behind, or alternatively, who refuse to submit to something horrible no matter how much bigger than them it is. It's a completely valid stance to take and one I will probably take myself but you do have to make peace with the fact that the rest of society is almost definitely going to pick the dopamine buttons over you.
If you can accept being disconnected, then by all means, live your best life. I'm certainly planning to (although it's also important to recognize that this is not a purely binary decision).
I can say you've probably spoken for me in this post.
I'm old enough to be that guy that wants less people in his life. I'm fine with what little friends I have, my family and my dog's. The rest is noise, and I'll deal with it only if I want to, otherwise, there's plenty of animé, books and documentaries I can fill my solo time with, for the rest, I'll always have the main 3 I mentioned.
I guess I did turn into that "grumpy old guy" I 🤣🤣
load more comments
(2 replies)
Same here
load more comments
(1 replies)
which is the dumbest shit in the world. why the fuck are people on facebook?
Well marketplace basically killed Craig's list, so that's one reason.
We gave away computer parts on Craigslist a few months ago. It was a no-stress transaction and the receiver was a sweet old-school computer person building a basic machine for his kids to play Minecraft. Would do again.
we should kill facebook and go back to craigskist.
if we managed to take it down for like a month, the internet would heal itself so quick.
This one irks me. I grabbed an Auto-Trader paper today as I was reminiscing about how local trader-papers used to be a thing. I got my NES and Saxophone that way. I still have one of those. -Then craigslist ended that and now that has been replaced by a website that requires membership to read the listings.
Have you tried explaining something to someone lately? A lot of people don't care and don't understand. About anything
People are on Facebook because that's where everyone already is. They won't leave because then they lose contact with all those people.
'People who spend too much time on Facebook' overlaps with 'People who need cheap lawyers.'
load more comments
(3 replies)
I guess understandable for initial discovery, but it's on the lawyer if they didn't hand out a contact card with email phone and whatnot to all clients
Devils advocate, perhaps he did and clients still reached out on FB. When he got banned they assumed he ghosted and went with another lawyer.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
See? I knew the different instances of this bot would start fighting each other one day.
An Indianapolis based bankruptcy attorney, named Mark Steven Zuckerberg, is suing Meta over repeated confusion with CEO Mark Elliot Zuckerberg.
That’s far less crazy than the clickbait headline had me believe.
What did you think the headline meant?
I thought it meant it was the same guy. Like I didn't know if the FB Mark ever finished college or got a law degree or if he's representing himself. You know how some people will sue themselves or the company they started so they are the plaintiff and the defense.
The irony of this comment goes through the roof
The weirdest thing is that it wouldn't be the first time a party has sued itself.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
The attorney is asking for restitution —and a week on Zuckerberg’s yacht.
What
I was in danger of having sympathy for a lawyer, then this brought me back.
Way to take a serious matter and make it comical.
If you look at the actual quote, that is quite editorialized. My reading if the quote was that it was said in jest.
no way why should i change hes the one who sucks
Everything was fine until that no talent ass clown started making social media sites.
A celebrity? Holy fucking ego, batman!
I say make it a cage match. Thunderdome style.
He should just host his own instance and... oh, wait...
view more: next ›