this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
239 points (95.4% liked)

politics

25518 readers
2464 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Tucker wants to bottom for ol Pete.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Is that because Tucker would know?

[–] minkymunkey_7_7@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Fuchole Tucker has all the answers and knowledge on gay sex.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago

So based upon the principles of them always projecting, I guess this means Tucker Carlson is fake straight.

[–] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago

"Where is it? How can I have some?"

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago

Sounds like Tucker wants some new gooning material.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 17 hours ago

Tucker, secretly gay, needs some advice on gay sex. Smart move fucker! No one sees through your cover.

[–] fittedsyllabi@lemmy.world 18 points 17 hours ago

Tucker’s wants sex with Buttigieg, adorable.

The only thing Tucker Carlson deserves is an inescapable pit of sewage to starve to death in.

[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

Tucker has claimed multiple times at least since last year that Pete is actually straight. All because of his Gay Producer seemingly being the decider of who is and isn't gay. I wouldn't be surprised if either the Producer is just pulling it out of his ass, or he heard Pete might have dated women before coming out in 2015 so just assumes that means he couldn't be gay. Cause obviously there's no such thing as being in denial. That Producer might be experiencing a real Gold Star Lesbian thought process.

Either way, Tucker only knows anything about sex as a gay person because he's had sex with that demon (obviously an incubus) that supposedly scratched him last year. They were love scratches.

Tucker is a Demon Fucker. Pass it on.

[–] fiendishplan@lemmy.world 17 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Tucker Carlson is a little bitch.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 18 hours ago

He should take it up the ass (again) for journalistic integrity. The last time was in Moscow.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 14 points 22 hours ago

So Carlson thinks he needs to take Pete for a test drive to verify his bona fides?

I doubt if Buttigieg would have an interest in such an ordeal.

[–] TheMinister@sh.itjust.works 5 points 18 hours ago

“Like, real slow. In a whisper, in a really up close and personal interview. Mmhmm.”

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 92 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Tucker thinks about gay sex more than most gay men.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago

just imagine his bowtie spinning whenever he gets 'flustered'.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stickly@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Oh yeah? Well if you're so gay then why can't I suck your girthy dick?

-- Tucker "The Sucker (Throat Goat)" Carlson

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago

You know I think Tucker would know what dick taste like better then Pete.

[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 118 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shall we conclude that Pete turned down Tucker's advances

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Tucker was simply fake hitting on Pete to test if Pete was truly gay or not, obviously.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tucker: Pete wouldn’t let me stuck his dick. Definitely not gay.

Tucker truly is a penetrative journalist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 79 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait. This isn't the Onion?

[–] sad_detective_man@leminal.space 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

wow, Pete's turn getting his skull measured came sooner than I thought. I thought they'd get rid of the racial minorities first

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Tucker’s a little curious.

[–] LongIslandSunset@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Bi-curious.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 day ago

Typical conservative

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ghostsinthephotograph@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Questions that only Tucker Carlson would know.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Tucker, you need to learn to move on when your love interest won't go out with you.

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 28 points 1 day ago (3 children)

TELL ME ABOUT GAY SEX DAMN IT! DESCRIBE IT TO ME IN VIVID DETAIL! LEAVE NOTHING OUT!

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago (6 children)

My aunt is transphobic and explained the surgeries to me in vivid detail. She was trying to convince me it was somehow wrong because it was disgusting and I was just like "why do you know all this?". She claims to be so disgusted by it but went out of her way to research it.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

So moronic of Tucker.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 21 points 1 day ago

"I'd need like ... specific details. Maybe even use my name in place of your partner... You'd have to draw some pictures too, or better yet take photos. Lots of photos."

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 15 points 1 day ago

Hey Tucker, you're a fake straight until you give me intimate details about your sexual life :3

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

lmao

He added that if he ever interviews Buttigieg, “I’m gonna ask him very specific questions about gay sex and see if he can even answer. I doubt he even knows. You’re not gay, dude. Stop.”

Wait, is tucker in the epstein files?

load more comments (1 replies)

carlson's kgb handler: "become relevant again or internet show is cancelled, da?" (sweaty carlson proceeds to further debase himself for clicks)

[–] Bridger@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

Tucker Carlson is a lizard person wearing a human skin. He should allow himself to be flayed on live TV to prove otherwise.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’ve met seemingly normal people who think Tucker Carlson is a real political commentator with good ideas.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Maybe they have him confused with Chris Tucker. I can see the resemblance.

[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

Chris Tucker didn't know who Chelsea Clinton was while Bill Clinton was president, and I would still choose his political advice over Tucker Carlson.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 19 hours ago

There's a man I would trust every day at 8pm.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'd take Ruby Rod. He's at least green.

[–] LongIslandSunset@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Super green.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope Pete calls Tucker’s bluff because I am extremely curious what specific knowledge the latter has about gay sex that the former can confirm.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is Tucker Carlson gatekeeping gayness?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›