You can conveniently ask the device around your neck a question.
You then must pull out a different device from your pocket with exactly the same functionality to get the answer thereby saving you 0 time.
This privilege costs over $100.
this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
95 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
40269 readers
485 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
it’s so much more sinister than that and I never thought about any of this before checking this vid out, to be honest. The “they’ve reached the end of what they can Hoover up online and now they have to go into the real world to steal more data” part is uhhhhh concerning
As an added bonus, you get overt spyware to wear around your neck so it can listen to and log your every conversation.
why are techbros so obsessed with AI-wearables? first the Rabbit, then the Humane pin, now this? We already have phones that listen to us 24/7, why do they think anyone wants another thing to lug around?
"data is the new oil"
most people keep their phones in their pockets, which would ruin audio quality for 24/7 listening, and Apple and Android are able to restrict app permissions as well to prevent it.
VC money doesn't care about whether normal people actually want a device like this. what they're really after is "we're collecting a bunch of user-specific data that no one else has, that we can sell to people who think it'll help them do better ad targeting (among other things)"
Yeah that adds up. Everything is about naked, cynical capitalism now. I guess my millennial brain is stuck in the era where I thought the point of consumer electronics was to make cool devices that people wanted to buy.
This is the end, my friend
I blame Carl Icahn. Sure, he made a shitton of money, but only by restructuring the entire U.S. economy around quarterly returns -- and seemingly quarterly layoffs.
One attendee who works at a Big Tech company, holding a bottle of wine he had finished throughout the night, joked they should kill me for wearing a listening device. (Not funny.) I yanked the pendant off and stuffed it in my purse.
Silicon Valley is a fucking cesspool.
I asked what the problem was, and it said, “Your microphone. Maybe your attitude. The possibilities are endless.” Now we were arguing. I asked what its capabilities were. It accused me of being dramatic and said things like, “I’m challenging your assumptions. That’s how we fix real problems.”
Lol, even snarking it's full of slop.
Totally normal
In our meeting, he asked us not to unbox the devices in front of him because he is in love with someone and wants the first time he witnesses a Friend unboxing to be with her.
Sliced bread is cheaper and just as effective as being a useless part of your internet communication. Hell, just take her out for a nice meal.
it can make the people around you uneasy.
I don't need one, I've got that covered, thanks.
If I wanted to READ ai "snark", I would spend more time on facebook, or go back to reddit. How hard could it be to slap a battery and 4G/5G modem on a google home or alexa? Eiter of which would be easier to run on a phone or tablet, which also includes speakers.
How do these morons that can't match the convenience of existing privacy nightmares, or even DIY stuff, continue to get VC funding?
Get VC funding... like this:
Schiffmann posits himself as older now, wiser, more experienced than he was when he first debuted the Friend necklace. (He is 22.) He has grown out his hair and cultivated a beard
A wise 22 year old with a beard... 😮💨
The VCs are clueless, they jump on a bunch of "feels good" and "disruptive young blood" stuff, hoping that maybe 1 in 10 will not fall and burn.
Oh, I'm fully aware. It just boggles the mind how the same tired outlook has endured for decades now.
Appearances, preconceptions, stereotypes... are shortcuts used to deal with complex issues. Since VCs don't really care about 90% of the startups, they only need to weed out the worst ideas, in the quickest way possible.
Story time: When I was 20, I had some job interviews lined up, so a family friend helped me pick a decent looking suit and robe that weren't too expensive. Got offered 3 different jobs in a single week 🤷
Well, don't use it then.
Can't really say that when it is an always listening device. Can't really not use it if someone around you has one
Unfortunately we live in a world where people often have the right to do things that we personally disapprove of.
Then your original comment means nothing. Also, two-party consent is pretty common
It's not universal. Where I live it's one-party consent.
OK? Again the comment of "Don't use it" is even more pointless if you live in a single party consent state.
But my comment about how people have the right to do things you personally disapprove of is even more pointful.
people have the right to do things you personally disapprove of
meanwhile, literally in the headline:
Worse, it can also make the people around you uneasy.
no one is saying you don't have "the right" to wear this Spyware Pendant in your one-party consent state.
people are saying it's creepy and you're jumping in defending it with "well, technically, it's not illegal, depending on state law". you're just completely missing the point entirely.
this is like, if someone wrote an article about how people are annoyed by someone microwaving fish in the office cafeteria, you chimed in with "well they can simply quit and find a different job where people don't microwave fish at the office".
no one is saying you don't have "the right" to wear this
Okay, we're in agreement then.
yeah, no, we still disagree. I think you are missing the point completely, and continually.
general protip: if the conversation is about some behavior being creepy or weird or against social mores, and you jump in talking about the legality of it, you are missing the point, and also contributing to the creepiness.
for another example, upskirt photography was legal in the US until 2004 (at least at the federal level, state laws seem to have trickled in around the same timeframe)
hop in a time machine back to 2000, and imagine there's a digital camera that's marketing itself as being very easy to attach to your shoe in order to take surreptitious upskirt photos.
people say "wow that's a fucking creepy product" and you jump in to say that technically it's not illegal, and people have the right to attach cameras to their shoes. and if a woman is wearing a skirt in a crowd of people, and sees a guy with a camera on his shoe, she has the right to walk away from him. that is technically true, and also completely misses the actual point.
if you think upskirt photos are a bad analogy, here's a reddit thread from 2 weeks ago about a gynecologist wearing the "Meta Ray-Ban" sunglasses that have a built-in camera.
yeah, no, we still disagree.
Okay, then, we're in disagreement. But I'm still able to use it, so.
Call it creepy if you want, that's fine, that's your opinion. It's not infringing anyone's rights.
But I’m still able to use it, so.
yeah. except when you're not.
because this "I can do whatever I want" Ron-Swanson-wannabe brand of libertarianism is very predictable.
if you go to a dinner party and the host notices your Spyware Amulet and says "turn that off or leave my house" would you respect their property rights? without pissing and moaning about it?
if a bar or restaurant banned them (like happened with Google Glass) would you respect that rule as well?
if you were on a date, and your date noticed and said "that's kinda creepy, would you mind turning it off?" would you do it? or would you start ranting about how it's not infringing on your date's rights?
Those places aren't public places, so of course I'd turn it off or leave.
If I was in public and someone told me to stop recording, I'd likely say "no." Hasn't that been a major point of pushback against police demanding that we not record them, for example?
No, that comment is pointless regardless. Of course people can do things I don't like. That was never in question. That does not mean they are free from consequences or societal repercussions.
You also have the right to smear shit on your face, but don't be surprised if no one wants to hang out with you.
Fortunately, you can punch them in the face to provide some badly needed attitude adjustment.
Uh huh
And what about those around you? What about the people in the streets, the people you interact with?
I don't want this shit but now I have no choice, I WILL BE MONITORED.
The only way out is to be a fucking hermit in the forest, at this point