this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
90 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

40277 readers
389 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One night, a friend of mine went out for dinner with her husband and toddler. The toddler, who sometimes had trouble swallowing, choked on his food — and threw up, repeatedly, in the restaurant. People around them were laughing while my friend and her family were in distress, adding to their embarrassment. But that wasn’t the worst part, she told me. She thought someone might have been filming. What if a video of her child being sick went viral? What if the awful laughter at the restaurant never ended?

Social media has long been a game of roulette with fame at one end and public disgrace at the other. But if I am posting under my government name on Bluesky (or Facebook, or X, or Nextdoor, or whatever), at least I know I am rolling the dice on becoming the next unwitting bean dad, Brienne of Snarth, or Justine Sacco. Now all it takes to become the internet’s main character is to appear in public, where people film each other to perform the dual task of policing behavior and creating potential viral content.

Look, it’s easy to see why that Coldplay couple went viral. The exaggerated response to being on camera — and trying to duck an arena’s kiss cam — is funny. The couple is possibly cheating (immoral, loathed by TikTok) and Chris Martin (the man who knowingly married Gwyneth Paltrow and then consciously uncoupled!) gets a good dunk in. All someone had to do was identify them, and they had one of the world’s most powerful accelerants: the bad behavior of a CEO with one of his employees. It was perfect internet content.

The fact that it’s perfect internet content is also what encourages us to surveil each other. And the consequences of the funny internet video were very real. The CEO resigned. His former subordinate is getting a divorce, which I know because People and E! News reported on the filing as news. The humiliation didn’t end with the viral video — it’s still ongoing, and by writing about it, I am in some sense participating.

This is all possible because our society built a panopticon that any of us can use against any other at will. And while virality isn’t new, TikTok’s algorithm makes it easier than ever for videos to take off unexpectedly, because users don’t even have to share the video to make it go wide. You don’t even have to get caught on a kiss cam at a concert.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Corelli_III@midwest.social 7 points 12 hours ago

"my friend's toddler threw up at PF Changs and she was worried it might end up on TikTok" = anonymity is dead, huh

great work they're doing over there are The Verge

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 28 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I love the double meaning in the title. We're both content for consumption, and content with the situation.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 5 points 19 hours ago

I was seriously tying my brain in knots trying to figure out which syllable got the stress and therefore whether it was a verb or a noun.

Clever, yes, but not a great hed as clarity goes.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 24 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

This is why we never go out, aren't on commercial social media and don't post pictures of ourselves online 🙂

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You can go to rural or forest areas. Unless bears also have Tiktok you should be fine. :)

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 14 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Bears are safer than humans, you always know where you are with a bear.

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 7 points 22 hours ago

Well, that's certainly true.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 16 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Where I live, recording someone without their consent -- even in public -- is a crime.

I have personally argued both sides on this. Over time I have come to favor it.

EDIT: some background

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 6 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

That's interesting. In North America this was largely litigated during the era of film photography and common law went in the other direction. You do not have control over being recorded or photographed in a situation where there is not have a reasonable expectation of privacy - at least for non-commercial purposes. Restaurants and walking around in public are classic examples of this.

I honestly wasn't even aware of jurisdictions that had an opposite approach.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 2 points 12 hours ago

I was being a bit loose. You can video record people in public -- just not audio. Any audio on your video recording device makes it illegal.

There are 13 US states like this

https://recordinglaw.com/party-two-party-consent-states/

[–] ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml 6 points 18 hours ago

It's like this in pretty much all of continental Europe afaik. You have to accept being filmed in public simply due to the fact that you're in public, for example, if a documentary about your city is being filmed and you walk into it, or the news, etc. However, it's not allowed to film someone specifically or take their picture without their consent, as in the restaurant example in the OP.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It's true.

Everybody recognizes this Guy.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 13 points 19 hours ago

Oh, for Fawkes' sake.

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Just wear disposable faces.

You humans wear the same face your entire life and then get upset when people recognize it?! Get over yourself! Aside from the obvious privacy issue, let's be real: it's also gross.

[–] krunklom@lemmy.zip 3 points 18 hours ago

Just go outside anywhere in a major city, there's a veritable sea of faces that can be yours, all yours, if you can just remove the thing they're attached to.