this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
523 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

74193 readers
3916 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tibi@lemmy.world 5 points 31 minutes ago

You could say they are... Perplexed.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 17 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Perplexity argues that a platform’s inability to differentiate between helpful AI assistants and harmful bots causes misclassification of legitimate web traffic.

So, I assume Perplexity uses appropriate identifiable user-agent headers, to allow hosters to decide whether to serve them one way or another?

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 48 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

This is a nice CloudFlare ad

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 8 minutes ago

yeah. still not worth dealing with fucking cloudflare. fuck cloudflare.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 14 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That’s the entire point, dipshit. I wish we got one of the cool techno dystopias rather than this boring corporate idiot one.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 3 points 2 hours ago

I'm still holding out for Stephen Hawking to mail out Demon Summoning programs.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 4 hours ago

Traveling snake oil salesman complains he can't pick people's locks.

[–] SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

It seems like it's some kind of distraction to make people think things aren't as bad as they really are, it just sounds too far-fetched to me.

It's like a bear that has eaten too much and starts whining because a small rabbit is running away from him, even though the bear has already eaten almost all the rabbits and is clearly full.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 8 points 3 hours ago

Words cannot describe how much I hate this person

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 37 points 5 hours ago

good, that means it’s working

I’m gonna be frustrated (though not surprised) if the response is anything other than this.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 34 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Good. I went through my CF panel, and blocked some of those "AI Assistants" that by default were open, including Perplexity's.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago

Is there some simply deployable PHP honeytrap for AI crawlers?

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 32 points 6 hours ago

Well... Good.

[–] Glitchvid@lemmy.world 169 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

When a firm outright admits to bypassing or trying to bypass measures taken to keep them out, you think that would be a slam dunk case of unauthorized access under the CFAA with felony enhancements.

[–] jve@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Right? Isn’t this a textbook DMCA violation, too?

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 74 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Fuck that. I don't need prosecutors and the courts to rule that accessing publicly available information in a way that the website owner doesn't want is literally a crime. That logic would extend to ad blockers and editing HTML/js in an "inspect element" tag.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

They already prosecute people under the unauthorized access provision. They just don’t prosecute rich people under it.

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

They prosecuted and convicted a guy under the CFAA for figuring out the URL schema for an AT&T website designed to be accessed by the iPad when it first launched, and then just visiting that site by trying every URL in a script. And then his lawyer (the foremost expert on the CFAA) got his conviction overturned:

https://www.eff.org/cases/us-v-auernheimer

We have to maintain that fight, to make sure that the legal system doesn't criminalize normal computer tinkering, like using scripts or even browser settings in ways that site owners don't approve of.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 36 points 7 hours ago (12 children)

That logic would not extend to ad blockers, as the point of concern is gaining unauthorized access to a computer system or asset. Blocking ads would not be considered gaining unauthorized access to anything. In fact it would be the opposite of that.

[–] cm0002@piefed.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You say, just as news breaks that the top German court has over turned a decision that declared "AD blocking isn't piracy"

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

Unauthorized access into a computer system and “Piracy” are two very different things.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 58 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 43 points 6 hours ago

As far as security is concerned, their w's are pretty common tbh. It's just the whole centralization issue.

[–] wosat@lemmy.world 29 points 6 hours ago

This is why companies like Perplexity and OpenAI are creating browsers.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 180 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It's difficult to be a shittier company than OpenAI, but Perplexity seems to be trying hard.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 44 points 7 hours ago

Step 1, SOMEHOW find a more punchable face than Altman

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 9 points 5 hours ago

I hate that these bots ruin my read it later app. :(

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 83 points 9 hours ago
[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 17 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Skill issue. Cope and seethe

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 34 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›