this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
401 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

74233 readers
4393 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Enzyoo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 53 minutes ago

Nah we don't support nazis

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 8 points 37 minutes ago

SpaceX should dump all their space plans and give back their grant money.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 38 points 2 hours ago

"Give me all your money" says world's richest person, in a fit of originality.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 11 points 2 hours ago

Fiber all the way, especially if it is owned by the community. That would simply ensure that Musk nor TelCos can't fuck around with people. Fast speed, no data caps, low prices, and not being at the mercy of some wealthy jackhole would be wins across the board.

Also, if America has a 2nd Civil War, fiber will be much more safe than relying on sats - those can be shot down, or worse, Musk can cut off the good guys from having internet. It is simply harder to sabotage if the wires are underground and cannot be readily seen by hostile actors. As seen in Ukraine, the fucker has absolutely no compunctions against disabling the internet at key moments.

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 hours ago

What's dumb about this statement is all Elon would have to do is market to all the places where broadband companies refuse to go and be affordable. tRump already killed the rural broadband initiatives. There's literally no competition and word-of-mouth could probably pull in more who are unhappy with their broadband provider.

However, capitalism and greed are cancers that know no limit...

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago

Musk = POS Nazi.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Well I say starlink and f'elon can suck my ass.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 hours ago

Goat says garden needs more carrots.

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Lol, lmao even

[–] baronofclubs@lemmy.world 40 points 7 hours ago

A society grows great when old men plant fiber whose speed they know they shall never download from.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 85 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Hmmm ditch lightning fast and stable fiber for the mediocre speed and unstable micro satellite internet connection controlled by a petty asshole...

What to do, what to do?

[–] d00ery@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago

Just think how much control he can have if he owns the medium which people access the internet.

And he'd only do good things with that power /s

[–] _lilith@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago

That will work out as well as the death tunnel (formerly hyperlink)

[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 41 points 10 hours ago

Fiber fucking rules

[–] Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Of course. In a month or two he can tell trump Dem statez are stupid and he should force them to do that.

[–] uairhahs@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

While trump looks down and says "don't take it out of your mouth again"

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 21 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Honestly, I think starlink is a fantastic idea in general, but this is clearly bullshit. Starlink works well in tandem with fiber, not as a replacement.

It's just never going to be as cost effective as installed fiber. Fiber is obviously the right technology to use in heavily populated areas i.e. for the vast majority of Internet users. And where the population is sparse and laying fiber for individual customers is cost prohibitive, that is where satellite connectivity shines. If SpaceX or anyone else is pretending otherwise, they're being blatantly deceitful and malicious. That's not in Internet users' best interest.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

In France they authorised air hanging fiber, so they just use electric poles and hang the fiber under the 220 volt lines, as a last resort.

Cheap as hell. Or, where there's a will there is a way.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 8 points 7 hours ago

As fiber is rolled out more, i see less and less why it would be cost prohibitive?

All you need to do to connect a remote place is lay a cable. More expensive if you need dig a trench and put the cable in there. But if it can be done for electricity it can be done for fiber.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 7 hours ago

lets get down to the real reason he wants to do this. he would be able to turn off connection for millions if they piss him off, or hand over the data to said political actors like putin or trump, also to manipulate future elections like he did last time.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 24 points 10 hours ago

Alternative Headline: Billionaire Signals States Should Speed Fiber Rollout

[–] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 52 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Fibre is an investment that can be used and upgraded for decades. Starlink is a subscription service forever to a private company.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 21 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

And upgrading is piss cheap. Just change transceivers.

Same fiber cable that does 1gbps can do 100tbps.

[–] dropped_packet@lemmy.zip 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's not true... There are different types of fiber with different throughputs depending on the class of the cable and the length of the installation.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 8 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

It is true.

Multimode (what I think you're trying to reference) isn't used in distance applications at all, it’s only for short in-building links. Anything that your ISP would provide you would be single-mode. Carrier/Backbone is virtually 100% SMF as well. SMF (OS1 and OS2) don't really have a bandwidth cap. It's all transceivers not the fiber.

But the point is that fiber that ALREADY in the ground, you can upgrade simply by changing the transceivers. It doesn't matter the length, SMF/MMF, or anything else... you just get a transceiver rated for the length of run (power of the led/laser, and the optics). The length is irrelevant otherwise as the presumption is that the install in the ground has been shown to work in the past already.

Old standard ITU-G.652 single-mode has been made to push multi-petabit transfers in lab environments. The only change was the transceivers. And to be clear, ITU-G.652 was standardized in 1984. Nobody rips out the fiber from the ground (caveat is that the cable itself hasn't degraded). You just upgrade the optics/transceivers.


“It's not the fiber that’s limiting—ITU-T G.652 defines physical specs (dispersion, attenuation), not throughput. Field trials over 96.5 km of real-world G.652 fiber showed 56.5 Tb/s using advanced DWDM and modulation

source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.01873

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] etherphon@piefed.world 27 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Yeah! I want my internet connection run by a man baby who turns off your access if he doesn't like you!

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 9 hours ago

I would burn the money before giving it to the nazi

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 93 points 14 hours ago (12 children)

I’m a starlink customer and think it’s one of the best advancements in the past decade as it provides real access to rural addresses. The side effects of this is nearly immeasurable.

Spacex needs to STFU about this though. Fiber should continue to be deployed where possible.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 87 points 13 hours ago (8 children)

Fiber should be deployed to rural addresses like yours (and should've been a long time ago). Instead, that money was funneled to the likes of Time Warner and Comcast who never even followed through on their part of the deal. Now, SpaceX is getting funneled the cash.

I'm super thankful that WA State supports and gives assistance to counties building out public LUDs for fiber access, many paying attention to rural communities first. I escaped Comcast two years ago because of it.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 25 points 12 hours ago

Time Warner and Comcast need to have all that grant money clawed back. They contracted with the taxpayers to deliver a service and they didn't even make a good faith effort to start.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 146 points 15 hours ago (35 children)

all you can eat latency and an oversaturated network on devices with a limited lifespan.. what else could you ask for!

load more comments (35 replies)
[–] Sagan_Wept@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

That's a dumb ass idea, and I'm literally on Starlink right now

[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 68 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Basic physics says satellites using Ku-band or whatever they use can't compete with fibre.

Satellite internet has its uses like for ships at sea.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›