this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
443 points (99.6% liked)

politics

25875 readers
3125 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago

"May have"? The dude commits like 3 felonies on his way to breakfast ffs

[–] Azal@pawb.social 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I read it somewhere that anyone talking rule of law or the Constitution anymore is starting to sound like sovereign citizens, waving a document around like it's a magic shield that in reality does absolutely nothing.

I would like to disagree with this thought process, but I can't.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago

The law is not self-enforcing.

Since the government is now lawless, it's up to the citizenry to deliver what justice we can.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago

If only there were consequences, then this would have meaning.

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 34 points 6 days ago

Trump admin may have already broken the law

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago

If only there were laws for bloated old pedo billionaires

[–] F_State@midwest.social 17 points 6 days ago

They break the law constantly, every day

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 6 days ago

And? Laws don't matter to these people.

When there are consequences for a law being broken by these folks, report that.

Throw it on the pile

[–] mrslt@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago

Surely this will be the point at which he faces consequences...

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 days ago

Added to the list for no further action...

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Pretending the Trump administration hasn't already broken the law is massive click bait.

Also, billionaires will still be legal under the Democrats. That's the real reason Trump got in, and the real problem.

Returning to "the norm" is not a solution. They'll just be another Trump eventually unless the billionaire problem is addressed.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 days ago (3 children)

LOL. How exactly do you expect a politician to address "the billionaire problem"?

[–] ape_arms@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Well, in a perfect world, where the POTUS is immune from prosecution when executing official acts, they could seize their assets. Would it ever happen? The only way I could envision is if the vast majority of the population supports (or is indifferent to) such an action. But hey, we currently have a $200b secret police force roaming the land, so maybe there's a chance!

But seriously, an extreme wealth tax would be a step in the right direction.

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago (3 children)

What's Mario's brother's name? Politicians have more access than us regular folks.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You're doing a "the perfect is the enemy of the good".

Wealth tax, banning people from owning more than two investment properties. Have laws that put a ratio on the highest paid in companies to the lowest paid.

"It's too difficult and politicians are too complicit already, so don't complain" just isn't a good contribution. You either support that billionaires are a problem or you don't.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Nah. I'm just doing a "not completely naive".

It's possible to simultaneously acknowledge that wealth inequality is a problem and that it's not going to be addressed.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

That's an inaccurate perception of what you did, you didn't acknowledge the problem and now you're pushing your assumption that "nothing can or will be done".

ALL you're doing is dampening the possibility and providing the billionaire class cultural comfort by providing apathy for the masses.

It's not about truth, it's about possibility. Had a cultural comfort girl like yourself been in Luigi Mangione's position you would have laid down and died unnoticed.

You're the problem. People who claim to be "just seeking the truth" but are actually giving false assumptions as if they're certainties are the problem.

Give possibility, give hope. In this, the cultural space you're giving "billionaire boot licker", and I think that might be your own choice and what you actually want.

You're a stability and truth is better than equality, hope and cultural change kind of person.

You even started with "LOL" like a smug rich movie villain. Then to pretend you agreed it was a problem and gave truth? No you gave your own emotionally informed cultural defeatism.

You comfort billionaires and tell them to keep pissing, that's your choice. Your cope. Your pushing of apathy.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

LOL. Cry more, maybe the billionaires will stop existing.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

LOL, they're not gonna give you money just because you're willing to blow them.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

ROFLMAO ... but I sucked so much dweeb to get where I am.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

You only wanna be the best that you can...

[–] Elbow1240@lemmy.zip 14 points 6 days ago

I bet Comey really regrets releasing that memo in 2016.

[–] echo@lemmings.world 9 points 6 days ago

Breaking the law is a prerequisite for these stupid, fascist fucks...

[–] Philote@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 days ago

Trump- “Put it on my tab.”

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago
[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If I were on Trump's hit list I'd seek political asylum someplace sunny.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

Kimmel should really take that job offer in Germany

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

When people break the law, they are punished, right?..........right? Is that just another fairy tale like Santa Claus and the tooth fairy?

[–] F_State@midwest.social 3 points 6 days ago

Depends on how rich, powerful, and/or well connected they are.

load more comments
view more: next ›