this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
471 points (99.4% liked)

politics

25340 readers
2650 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Rep. Nicole Collier, the Democratic state lawmaker who spent Monday night inside the Texas Capitol, is asking a court to let her exit the building, alleging she's facing "illegal restraint by the government" after she was told she needs a police escort to leave.

The Fort Worth lawmaker and dozens of other Democrats left Texas earlier this month to delay a vote on a GOP-led plan to redraw the state's congressional map.

The Democrats returned to Texas in recent days and they were given state police escorts to ensure they will show up when the state House convenes Wednesday, but Collier refused to sign a "permission slip" to be under escort by the Texas Department of Public Safety. Collier says she slept on the House floor overnight.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 74 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What's to allege?

She is being illegally confined. Live on video. Out in the open.

[–] Jamablaya@lemmy.today 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It's legal, is the thing. They passed a law years ago, the last time the opposition tried the denying quorum trick. Maybe not constitutional, but no one bothered to get it in front of a judge.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Now is as good a time as any

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not true. Literally would have been better prior to the start of the collapse.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

The best time was earlier, the 2nd best time is now.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah but time machines don't exist so...

Yup

When do you want shade from a tree

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

When do the good guys with guns show up?

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I have bad news about Santa Clause and the Tooth Fairy...

[–] Cocopanda@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Now is the time that people with guns out number the police and GOP and tell them to kick rocks or they can “Get down!” With us good ole boys.

[–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 101 points 3 days ago (40 children)

They acknowledged that Texas law allows lawmakers who are absent from the Capitol to face civil arrest, but they say state officials have no legal right to detain legislators who are already present at the Capitol to ensure they don't leave.

Very normal country ya got there.

load more comments (40 replies)
[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So why the fuck did they go back, again?

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 days ago

Because if they stay gone long enough, their position can be declared abandoned and they can legally be replaced

[–] delgato@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It’s the same issue that plagues every person that is soberly seeing the collapse of American democracy. We all want to take a stand but at the end of the day these Texas Dems need to get back home for family, be in their districts with their constituents, and somehow go on with life. Even though everything is on the line it’s still not enough to loose yet for people, including the larger Texas populace.

[–] RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

I can 100% guarantee I am absolutely not soberly seeing this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 36 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So that means other states can just start randomly detaining members of their government, I guess? What a clusterfuck.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Only the fascist ones are considering it. The red ones.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 3 days ago

So what I'm hearing is, there are a bunch of police who can, at the will of people who don't like them, be 'forcibly' moved into certain areas.

Let them escort you. Get the political credit of an assassination attempt and get rid of some actual factual totally not anything but government bootlickers.

load more comments
view more: next ›