this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
53 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

74233 readers
4349 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 15 hours ago

More context from the article:

At the turn of the millennium, newspapers relied on classifieds for an average of 30% of their revenues. Martin and his colleagues found that the loss of this revenue led newspaper executives to cut costs largely by shrinking local political news coverage.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 20 points 15 hours ago

The reduction in coverage was most pronounced before primary elections.

The reduction in staff covering politics made it harder for voters to differentiate between moderates and extremists in partisan primaries, and allowed extreme candidates to do better than they did before.

This makes sense, and it explains a lot, actually.

And to be clear, it's not just craigslist as a culprit here, but it's such a controlled A/B test that the effects are reliably measurable.

In the original paper, they also observed reduced turnout for House/Senate elections (which the article didn't emphasize as much, but is defininitely there): https://academic.oup.com/restud/article/92/3/1738/7665573?login=false#517516514

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 23 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

You can’t just blame the fucking media. People at large are at fault for thinking republican bullshit is even halfway normal. They elected a pussy-grabbing, child-rapist felon who openly professes how he’d fuck his own daughter. To say nothing of his failed marriages, failed business, never having worked a goddamn day in his life, openly criminal associations and activities, and myriad public debacles.

Go on and marinate on that for a minute.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 9 points 12 hours ago

Propaganda works. Yeah, people are stupid, but if you spend decades destroying education and teaching disinfo, well... The results are predictable

You can hate them all you like, but you do have to look at the problem logically if you want to fix it

[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 22 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Nobody is "just blaming" any one thing except in your head. The headline says "helped fuel" not "single-handedly caused."

Maybe you've been affected by a related trend - that of not reading properly and just replying with whatever half-baked idea was already bouncing around?

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

We study these questions using the staggered introduction of Craigslist (CL)—the world’s largest online platform for classified advertising—across U.S. counties between 1995 and 2009.

So well before TACO Don was even a candidate.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Like that matters? You think fucking Gingrich and all those cunts were halfway normal? The last decent republican was Eisenhower.

[–] compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Ah yes, Eisenhower, famously a good guy for running fucking Operation Wetback.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

Dang, TIL!

The short-lived operation used military-style tactics to remove Mexican immigrants—some of them American citizens—from the United States.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It’s all relative, isn’t it. Would you rather him, when the tax on rich people was over 90%, or any of the vile cunts after him?

[–] compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 16 hours ago

Well, for me personally, since I’m an anarchist, I’d rather have neither. Power corrupts, and giving too much unchecked power to any individual will lead to harm. Even FDR, one of America’s “best” presidents, also oversaw redlining and the Japanese internment camps.

[–] Teal@lemmy.zip 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Let’s not forget his high achievement of winning a Golden Razzie award for his terrible performance as….himself. Yes, he achieved worst supporting actor playing himself. Not only that the movie is a perverted B- dumpster fire.

Ghosts Can’t Do It

Just to be clear, I’m not saying this is anywhere near as serious compared to the points you’ve made. Those are truly harmful things done to others. To know he was in such a low ranked movie and had the worst performance of everyone in it while trying to portray himself brings a bit of joy.

[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

That's pretty fascinating that they used the staged expansion of Craigslist to allow confounding factors to be accounted for.