this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
484 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

74265 readers
4331 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Money quote:

Excel requires some skill to use (to the point where high-level Excel is a competitive sport), and AI is mostly an exercise in deskilling its users and humanity at large.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 hours ago

Our very own economic Butlerian jihad.

[–] zeropointone@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago

Such a complicated way just to add more RAND() to formulas.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

OK, I'm not really mad at this. I already used Copilot to design a table for me in Excel and it worked really well. It did everything for me, and I just had to copy-paste the formulas into their appropriate spots. If it's built-in, possibly will work better.

Not everybody needs to be an Excel expert, after all. Having that functionality might be actually beneficial.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

Any time, nutsack.

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 47 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

Why would anyone use an LLM as calculator?

That just doesn't make sense.

It is like using a calculator as typewriter because it can spell 80085.

[–] jim3692@discuss.online 1 points 25 minutes ago

To waste electric energy. All those power plants produce immense amounts of energy that needs to be consumed. If we didn't have LLMs, the pollution of those plants would be for nothing. At least now, there is an attempt to put it in good use.

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Well, there is a use case.
I don't know much about statistics. I can (i assume) as the ai questions in natural language that I would otherwise have to research how to calculate.
Of course, I may get a result, but I won't be any smarter. If that was the goal, then great.

[–] Rambomst@lemmy.world 26 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

So what you are saying is, my car is a typewriter?

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

Microsoft might agree with this.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I did this with my car when I got to that point and sent it to my girlfriend, but I photoshopped it so it said I was going over 100. Anyway I thought it was funny.

[–] Rambomst@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I was in the car with my missus, every 2 seconds she was making sure I hadn't missed the big moment. She's a good egg.

[–] tux0r@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago
[–] tux0r@feddit.org 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 5 hours ago

High brow humour indeed

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 110 points 17 hours ago (21 children)

There are things that could be done to improve Excel. For instance, fully integrate python and allow it to be used to create custom functions. Then, maybe one day, VBA can ride off into the sunset where it belongs.

Adding Copilot to Excel is not an improvement because Copilot and all other LLM based platforms frequently barfs out totally incorrect information about how to do something in Excel.

"You do that using formula."

No, I can't, you worthless pile of shit because THAT FORMULA DOESNT EXIST.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 59 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

Integrated python scripts in excel sounds like a malware developers dream.

[–] rollerbang@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I mean... Yeah, but the same can be said for VB?

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 1 points 12 minutes ago

Yeah, but lots more tooling and libraries for Python. Its just one more attack surface 🤷

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Especially since VBA can make calls to the Windows API directly and through that avenue do all kinds of funky things to your system.

[–] turkalino@lemmy.yachts 15 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Surely there’s some sort of sandboxing that could be done? Like start by disallowing sys calls entirely

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 6 points 13 hours ago

Definitely, but sandboxes can be escaped, and you can't protect everything via sandbox. Apparently its all cloud anyway, but if it were local and sandboxed, there are still exploits like rowhammer and spectre that may cause further risks.

Its taken years to get browser sandboxes to where they are, and even they get broken every so often.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 29 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

And a nightmare for an application developer told to make some app with a spreadsheet for a database scale

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 37 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Could result in some very cursed codebases.

"We dont use git, we just update the excel spreadsheet"

[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 21 points 15 hours ago

I've worked at places where they did that anyway lol

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 6 points 11 hours ago

Is that creepy thing still alive?

[–] elvith@feddit.org 8 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

They foresaw that. That's because python on Excel doesn't run locally, but in the cloud and then returns the result to you: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/introduction-to-python-in-excel-55643c2e-ff56-4168-b1ce-9428c8308545

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

That's the worst possible solution to that problem. Why can't they just develop their own script that's Turing complete but doesn't have any system calls?

[–] chillhelm@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Or just use Lua compiled without the system calls. This is done by many video games. İt's 2025, there is no need to create new domain specific languages.

[–] tux0r@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

Or use embedded Lisp, like all the cool kids.

[–] magikmw@piefed.social 3 points 6 hours ago

That's even worse!

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Still sounds like you'd be shipping your data to the cloud, where it can be exfilled from there.

Would potentially be a great phishing tool, just need to trick someone into putting sensitive data into a precooked excel file, and it gets exfilled.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›