this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
180 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25872 readers
3177 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/46954791

Trump referenced a weekend conversation with Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek, and he alluded to being told by Kotek that the reality in Portland is different from what's being portrayed to him.

"I spoke to the governor, she was very nice," Trump said. "But I said, 'Well wait a minute, am I watching things on television that are different from what's happening? My people tell me different.' They are literally attacking and there are fires all over the place...it looks like terrible."

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

Trump certainly has gone senile and he's being manipulated. Remember, Trump is merely the front and the fall guy, the real power pulling the strings are the oligarchs who bankrolled him.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

JFC, all of this is just so very stupid.

He really is the average Faux viewer manifested as President. So many of those fucking idiots think that BLM/antifa literally burned cities to the ground.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

He's a complete puppet who has no idea what's going on. A figurehead who believes whatever the fascist regime tells him and signs whatever executive orders they put before him. They still need him because the cult base is what keeps them in power-, otherwise he'd already be gone. What will they do when he dies or can't go out in public any more? I'm not sure if they know, but I think once the midterms are over and once they believe they've cemented their power they'll get rid of him in a heartbeat.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So he asked if what he was told by others was correct, almost certainly was told it was wrong by the actual Governor that would know firsthand... And still decided to send the military based on the lie.

This proves an intent to ignore reality, not just decisions based on misinformation provided.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

The problem is the Governor wasn't the last person to tell him something.

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 91 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh God. The reality TV guy thinks TV is reality.

[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

This was known from his first term. He had hours of "Executive Time" scheduled every day that was just him watching television. Fox News Grandpa is running the nation.

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 67 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Are his handlers showing him old riot footage?

[–] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 59 points 1 day ago

His handlers are showing him exactly what they need him to see.

Same thing I was saying about Trump leaving in 2020. He might be gone, but the people who found him useful aren't. Whatever we attribute to Trump, the thing to remember is that Trump is just the outlet. There's a whole wellspring that is the source of his vitriol.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

It could have been riot footage from Hong Kong, and would probably have worked just as well.

[–] chiocciola@lemmy.cafe 11 points 1 day ago

Well, they showed him a picture of a medical bed and he posted it online apparently

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's called dementia, Mr. President.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Remember when Reagan would confuse movie plots with things that actually happened? The USA doesn't learn from its mistakes.

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Thanks to the marvels of the modern education system... No.

[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 52 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I thought the design of the national guard was that it reported to the governor of the state, not the president.

I thought the entire point of the national guard was to oppose tyrannical actions by federal government, and that it was never intended to be handed over to federal control without approval from said governor or some truly special circumstances like a real invasion.

The federal government was originally intended to not have a substantial standing army. The national guard was intended to be our army and effectively independent per state so that only the states' wishes of a combined force would be honored.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 19 hours ago

We lost the plot on that one when we used the National Guard to force the shitty racist confederate states to be a little bit less racist. It set a bad precedent and with the power of hindsight was not the correct move. In hindsight we should have just Nuremberg’d all the traitorous confederates right after they lost. We’d be in much better shape now.

[–] Cassanderer@thelemmy.club 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Feds are only supposed to regulate interstate commerce, without any barriers on trade or people within states.

They are way way over their authority and need to be put into check after this dumster fire burns out.

[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago

If a non-Confederate takes office someday, the ability of the president to commandeer National Guard troops needs to be removed from law. There's no reason for it. Really, it should be a constitutional amendment.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Little late to be asking that for the first time now, Donald. Is this that thing where old people have a brief flash of sanity before they go out forever?

[–] Batmancer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 18 hours ago

lol I was thinking something similar, but hoping for let these be a reverse John Fetterman stroke.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

We must spend millions to stop this antifa banana. He’s an immediate threat to national security. The sax looks shifty too. I’m worried his IQ may be even higher than our own president. Send in the seals!

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Good job. Now we wait

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

See the rainbow armband? That how we know they're antifa!

Is he becoming self aware for the first time?