this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
285 points (98.3% liked)

politics

25872 readers
3188 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With just over 24 hours before the government is set to shutdown, Donald Trump and congressional leaders from both parties emerged from a high-stakes White House meeting on Monday with no agreement, setting the stage for large swaths of the federal government to close after midnight Wednesday.

The impasse came after closed-door talks between the four top congressional leaders and Trump in the Oval Office, where lawmakers appeared to trade blame but make little progress towards a deal. “There are still large differences between us,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told reporters after the meeting, claiming that Republicans refused to engage on their core demands around health care and restoring previous funding cuts.

“Their bill has not one iota of Democratic input,” he added, taking aim at a House-passed seven-week stopgap funding bill that Senate Democrats rejected last week. “That is never how we’ve done this before.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 hours ago

Let the federal government stay that way. Blue states should start picking up services where the federal government left off. And the feds don't need their tax money, either.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago
[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 62 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

Time can go fuck itself for this bullshit headline. "Democrats leave White House with no deal"?

How about "Republicans refuse Democrat deal, setting stage for Republican Government shutdown"

Or maybe something like "Republicans Refuse To Give Americans Benefits and Medical they Pay For, Govenment Shutdown Imminent"

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

It is pretty obvious, the narrative has been completely captured. All news only reports what these imbeciles say. No pushback, always giving them the deference.

This happened after 9/11 in a very pronounced way. No serious or widespread criticism was allowed in mainstream media. Although the government did apply some pressure it was mostly voluntary.

What do you do when all the pseudo rulling institutions capitulate to a tyrant willingly? What happen when the government becomes indistinguishable from the mob?

The answer is not much, because it has happened many times before already. People need to wake up.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

We're so fucked.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 49 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Republicans don’t want a deal. Then they can make up whatever they want about democrats and claim they’re the problem and maneuver for more power grabs.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 9 points 10 hours ago

They can (and do) do that anyway. I don't think that's the plan here. To the halfway reasonable people, Republicans control congress. This is on them. The minority party's job us to play hardball. To the people listening to whatever Republicans say without question, it doesn't matter. They can make up anything they want a blame democrats. This doesn't do anything for them.

What did anyone expect anything different?

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 128 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Trump wants this shutdown. He was never gonna deal.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 33 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

No he doesn't. He needs to pay ICE agents. He needs the government to stay open.

Shutting the government down and keeping it shut down inhibits his ability to progress with fascism.

Shut the government down and what happens to the soldiers deployed to US streets?

No. Shut it the fuck down. Its idiotic to allow it to stay open.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 10 hours ago

I know some things continue to operate no matter what. I don't remember if ICE do. I'm sure border patrol continues to operate to some extent, but I have no idea to what degree. The same for the military. They still continue to some degree, but they have to scale down what jobs get done.

This is a long way to say, yes. I agree with you. However, it won't stop totally.

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 5 points 16 hours ago

Don’t worry, the generals are there to step in and take over any dept Trump deems necessary.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 75 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

It's a budget, he needs 50 votes and there's 53 senators with a R by their names...

If there's a shutdown it's cuz trump ordered it.

Schumer "negotiating" just makes it easier for idiots to blame it on Dems.

Mainstream media at large is acting like budget reconciliation isn't a thing...

The procedure overrides the Senate's filibuster rules, which may otherwise require a sixty-vote supermajority for passage. Bills described as reconciliation bills can pass the Senate by a simple majority of fifty-one votes or fifty votes plus the vice president's as the tie-breaker.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconciliation_(United_States_Congress)

trump doesn't need a single D vote in the House or Senate to pass a budget, he just doesn't want to

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 26 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

This is a funding bill, which is different than the budget/reconciliation process. He needs 60 votes.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 6 hours ago

You think "budget reconciliation" which was literally invented to make sure a budget is passed...

Doesn't apply to the annual budget, which has been passed by budget reconciliation for like a decade straight?

[–] ProfessorPeregrine@reddthat.com 20 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

Majority in House but 60 votes in Senate are needed to avoid a filibuster, which will require some Democrats.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ech@lemmy.ca 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Wasn't that what they passed in July?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 16 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

All the more reason to use it once the new fiscal year starts....

If Schumer caves, they can abuse the rule and pass something 1000x times shittier under reconciliation.

They were able to pass that a few months ago, because they didn't use reconciliation for last year's budget, it was just a CR all year

Which is likely what will happen again, and why Schumer would be a giant fucking idiot to negotiate just so Republicans don't have to use it.

Like, good point, but it just brings us full circle.

Quick edit:

Because Senate can use reconciliation once a fiscal year

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Is that simply a senate rule that can be bypassed with a simple majority?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 32 points 19 hours ago

They have the majority. Should have told them to make a deal with themselves if they actually give a shit.

But controlled opposition, doing controlled opposition things, to maintain the illusion of democracy.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Genuine question, can't they just...not shut down?

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

No. Someone may correct me if I'm wrong but they have an agreed debt ceiling and without an agreement raising it they're essentially out of money to fund federal stuff. I mean not really, but they are.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It's not like they honor the budget after they pass it anyways. Trump just comes in and says he's not paying it and the Republicans let him. Why bother with any deal like that

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Republicans want to believe they're the party of Fiscal Responsibility. They need at least some evidence to that affect, or else they lose their own perception of themselves. The debt ceiling is one of those.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

They lost this a long time ago. At best, it is just a vestigial of the Republican party. A lame excuse everyone knows is a lie that they will trot out every once in awhile when they still find the need to show off their virtue against an opponent.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 17 minutes ago

Yes, that's all correct. They still need to believe it about themselves.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 74 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Americans will never miss their water until the well runs dry.

It's not that Americans are all racist, or all ignorant... it's that enough of them don't spare a thought to think things through until it effects them personally.

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 60 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Welcome to life in America. Where intelligence and common sense aren't so common. People will literally kill you so they can happily vote against their own interests.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 14 points 19 hours ago (8 children)

Truth.

Living in Canada is like having crazy downstairs neighbours but for some reason one of our roommates keeps inviting them upstairs.

I have not been to the USA in a decade. Literally the only reason I'll ever, ever, return is to visit Casa Bonita in Colorado... ideally on a layover.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 16 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

This is true of people in general. While comfortable enough, or able to rationalize the discomfort away, people tend to not want to change. It takes a large shove to get people to act. Having a huge and diverse country with lots of built-in disconnects doesn't help.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It affects me personally that you used the wrong form of "effect/affect".

[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 1 points 9 hours ago

I hope your comment effects a correction.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 30 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Why are Democrats trying to make deals with fascists is the real headline.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 hours ago

Yeah... that's how things work. What, should they just bring in guns and kill them all? No, their job is to get the best outcome they can get (in their opinion). You can let the Fascists do whatever they want or you can try to make it as painless as possible while they progress. I prefer the latter.

It's the citizenry's job to fight them. Legislators do what they can in congress to slow them down and we fight them where we can. Giving up all power in congress is stupid. It should be used as best as possible, which is not just giving up.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 17 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

TBF it is their job attend legislative sessions. I agree with the spirit of your comment.

To answer your question... clearly the weren't trying that hard.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago (6 children)

I disagree. I would argue that their job is to represent their constituents. Sometimes that might involve attending legislative sessions. Other times that might involve intentionally not engaging with the opposition party, if that is in the best interests of the constituents.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 11 points 17 hours ago

yeah we all know trumps diplomatic skills he put on display at the un. Our country can survive if republicans grow a pair and impeach this guy.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 14 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 22 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

What do they need a coup for? They control the whole damn thing.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

They don't though, clearly. Republicans control congress, but Republicans clearly aren't a hive mind. A coup would put all power under the executive. It gives one person the power to make decisions where the party as a whole may disagree occasionally.

Also, mid terms are coming up. They very well may lose control of congress.

[–] blave@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Who could have ever predicted this?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Putin wants chaos so Trump and his gang deliver chaos.

load more comments
view more: next ›