this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2025
84 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25872 readers
3307 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
aidan@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
JuBe@lemmy.world
Lasherz12@lemmy.world
84
Taiwan pressured to move 50% of chip production to US or lose protection (arstechnica.com)
submitted 16 hours ago by MuskyMelon@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hahahaha oh brilliant move.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

The US is scared of the impending doom created when China invades Taiwan and takes over all chip production in a matter of a few months.

Nothing the US has can stop that when it starts, there can only be a deterrent, but that works only so far...

On the other hand it sees a solution to just hamfistedly claim 50% of the chipproduction to be local in the USA, easily forgetting the work ethics of the average American don't fit for that scenario, let alone how the government is wrecking the needed education for a decade or two to come at least...

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Currently the US needs an independent Taiwan because that's where all their chips come from. Makes sense for the US to move production to the US where it's less vulnerable to Chinese takeover, but that also means that the US won't need Taiwan to be independent anymore.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Oh this isn't good.

They prop up all of our biggest companies. World war III could sneakily start in the south China sea. Over this.

[–] TammyTobacco@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago

China is already making moves to go to war with Taiwan. It's likely going to start in 2026.

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 37 points 14 hours ago

Rely on the US, get extorted. The US has no friends, only colonies to exploit and pillage

[–] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 3 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

What is it about these chips that makes them so special? Are they for something practical or are they for advanced weapons or AI? Why does a country need them so badly?

[–] Redacted@lemmy.zip 5 points 7 hours ago

Currently they make the best ones and are basically the only ones that can. These chips go into most cutting edge electronics such as AI

[–] thfi@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 8 hours ago

Taiwan is a major center for chip manufactoring and development. Being a vital supplier for the U.S., Taiwan was protected by the U.S. as far as possible without openly disagreeing with mainland (communist) China. One could argue that Taiwan's chip industry has essentially protected the island from being invaded or nuked by mainland China. Without their advantage in chips and implied cover by the U.S. military, Taiwan would be under direct threat by mainland China "unification".

[–] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Suddenly reunification with the mainland was on the table after years of tactfully avoiding the topic.

Whose asset is this trump character, anyway?

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 3 points 7 hours ago

This is all about covering his own blunder.

He's realized his tarrifs aren't doing much to bring manufacturing to the USA, so now he'll threaten to abandon his allies instead if they don't prop up his idiotic economic policy.

[–] AmericanEconomicThinkTank@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago

I've been lucky enough to see the real deal in deposition layering testing and research for chip making. From clean-room methods stricter than bio and radiological test lab standards to seeing the wafers with a shimmer even more gorgeous than diamonds to me. It's so far beyond

We just ain't going to manage to make that a nation-wide mainstay. We might be able to have started to approach the technical side of things if investments and education were started in the early 90s, but our culture just isn't up to snuff to keep it going. So much of a society's culture bleeds into business, and damn do they have it locked down where it needs to be.

[–] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 11 points 14 hours ago

LOL. That's not even a real ask. It's like if I walked into work tomorrow and asked for a 200% raise.