this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
4 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

74073 readers
2818 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/34272214

A California-based biotechnology startup has officially launched the world's first commercially available butter made entirely from carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and oxygen, eliminating the need for traditional agriculture or animal farming. Savor, backed by Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates through his Breakthrough Energy Ventures fund, announced the commercial release of its animal- and plant-free butter after three years of development.

The revolutionary product uses a proprietary thermochemical process that transforms carbon dioxide captured from the air, hydrogen from water, and methane into fat molecules chemically identical to those found in dairy butter. According to the company, the process creates fatty acids by heating these gases under controlled temperature and pressure conditions, then combining them with glycerol to form triglycerides.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not a scientist, but isn't EVERYTHING made of carbon?

Source: Joni Mitchell, Woodstock -

We are stardust, we are golden We are billion-year-old carbon

[–] Gsus4@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Made of" can mean "composed of" or "constructed from". This is the latter:

Savor says they take carbon dioxide from the air and hydrogen from water, heat them up, oxidize them and get a final result that looks like candle wax but is in fact fat molecules like those in beef, cheese or vegetable oils.

The entire process releases zero greenhouse gases, uses no farmland to feed cows, and despite its industrial appearance, has a significantly smaller footprint.

"In addition to the carbon footprint being much lower for a process like this, right, the land footprint is, like, a thousand times lower than what you need in traditional agriculture,"

Good example of how choice of words can mislead, particularly when intentional.

[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Thank goodness we have the assurances of a billionaire oligarch to help steer humanity in the right dietary direction.

[–] flightyhobler@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Problems come up: "BILLIONAIRES SHOULD DO MORE!" Billionaires do more: "WE CANT TRUST BILLIONAIRES!!"

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

The conclusion ought to be that billionaires shouldn't exist. Even if they donate most of their wealth, they will still donate in ways that aren't necessarily solving real problems.

[–] teuniac_@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Global warming and ecological crises make shifting diets away from animal products a pretty good idea.

Whether it's antibiotics resistance, deforestation, or greenhouse gas emissions, humanity is paying a very high price for animal agriculture at the current scale.

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

but does it actually taste like the real thing? because I can already buy something that, supposedly, I should be unable to believe isn't real butter, but after doing so I remain suspicious

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

The first time I had "I can't believe it's not butter," I said "I can believe it's not butter."

[–] Binturong@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Good ol' Gates, always around to make a quick buck of the bloodied backs of humanity. Never an advancement meant to aid us all he can't swoop in to parasitize. That's right Billy boy, I didn't forget the COVID vaccine patents. Billionaires must be condemned to the rubbish bin of history.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

While I think this is pretty amazing science stuff, the writing is terrible. Here is the progression of the story as written:

They made butter from carbon...

Well, it's actually made from carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and oxygen...

OK, it's actually made from carbon dioxide, hydrogen, oxygen, and methane...

Well, no, it's actually made from carbon dioxide, hydrogen, oxygen, methane, and glycerol...

Wait, hang on, it's actually made from carbon dioxide, hydrogen, oxygen, methane, glycerol, natural flavor, and lecithin...

Now, the source of glycerol is in question, because they say this butter is both animal and plant-free. Glycerol can be made synthetically, but it's WAY more expensive to do it. Also, I'm not seeing any way to create lecithin without plants. They never say what the "natural flavor" is.

[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

It kind of sounds like the beginnings of star trek's replicators...

But that aside, somehow I doubt those are the exact only "ingredients" they use.
And it wouldn't surprise me at all if the end product contains all kinds of trace elements of various not so healthy chemicals used to get the parts to combine into the actual butter.
Like the process to get the glycerol or lecithin in a state they can use.

Ofcourse a lot of our dietary ingredients are contaminated in various levels anyway.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They never say what the "natural flavor" is.

A reminder that "natural flavor" doesn't mean healthier or even something you might want over the artificially created flavors. It just means it comes from a natural source and is not lab created.

Castoreum, sometimes used for vanilla and raspberry flavoring, comes from beaver anal secretions. That would be labelled under a "natural flavor" and you'd never be told more than that.

I'll take the artificial stuff any day just on principle there.

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How much carbon is emitted to run the factory to make it though? Are we talking a net negative here?

[–] kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

"Savor says they take carbon dioxide from the air and hydrogen from water"

I'm no expert but direct air capture of Co2 and water electrolysis both use a lot of power. So using them for this purpose is likely just a marketing gimmick that doesn't make any sense either economically or for the climate.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This is really about how we feed our species and heal our planet at the same time

Yeah we need more fat. That's what's gonna help. More fat. Who owns the weight loss med patents and how long until they purchase the artificial fats patent?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Honestly, I think we do need more fat. Everyone seems to be obsessed with less fat and more protein, but fat is an essential nutrient. If you want to lose weight, I recommend increasing your (healthy) fat consumption because you'll get more satiety per calorie vs carbs, and fatty foods are more likely to have protein than carbs.

If artificial fat can replace dairy or destructivly farmed veggie oil, I'm all for it.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago

You don't have to preach nutrition to me, I cook everything from scratch.

The problem here is that obese societies are already over-reliant on fat, so making it more available and cheaper is going to be self-destructive.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So, like every other butter and oil, that's why we call them hydrocarbon.

I imagine this "butter" doesn't contain any glycomacropeptide, α-lactalbumin, β-lactoglobulin, serum albumin and immunoglobulins

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You're probably right, but I can't wait to see the egg on your face if it does turn out to contain glycomacropeptides, α-lactalbumin, β-lactoglobulin, serum albumin and immunoglobulins!

All butter is made from CO2 it simply goes through a processing step known as cow.