this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2025
-45 points (16.4% liked)

Technology

74873 readers
3049 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/36160327

Comments

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

who needs the web?

Anybody who cares enough to confirm whatever stupid bullshit the AI probabilistically regurgitated without actual understanding.

[–] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Seriously, in my experience AI generated results are only actually correct maybe 10% of the time

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What I really don't get is that there are in fact models that you can feed a document too and they will directly copy/paste quote relevant parts of that document in their reply complete with a little reference to the correct page. Basically a smarter ctrl-F function that can take sentences as input.

When that exists why is google using the probabilistic shit in their search?

[–] Yaky@slrpnk.net 21 points 2 weeks ago

If we can get food by going to the grocery store, who needs farms?

[–] dadarobot@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 2 weeks ago

where will ai steal the info from without the web?

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 12 points 2 weeks ago

My sister is a teacher and now has her students repeat back to her, "LLMs are not search engines".

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

LLMs, as the name suggests, are language models - not knowledge machines. Answering questions correctly isn’t what they’re designed to do. The fact that they get anything right isn’t because they “know” things, but because they’ve been trained on a lot of correct information. That’s why they come off as more intelligent than they really are. At the end of the day, they were built to generate natural-sounding language - and that’s all. Just because something can speak doesn’t mean it knows what it’s talking about.

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Death to CSS and we just render for the AI crawlers?

[–] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

The idea that AI is a “google killer” and a replacement for web sites always struck me as incredibly dumb. I know that’s how many people use it though, which is fairly awful. So, AI gets all of its information from websites. If it puts websites out of existence, where is it getting new information from?

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

who needs the web?

Generative AI that's who. For it to spit out information, it needs information. The argument may be that it is better at collecting all that information in one place and returning an answer, although we know it hallucinates responses. But to even begin a response it needs data, it needs the web.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

LLM: Something like what somebody might say.

Website: What somebody did say. (Depending on the site.)

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

How else would I access the AI? 🤷‍♂️