this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
375 points (99.0% liked)

politics

25368 readers
2609 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zeropointone@lemmy.world 110 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

An interesting choice regarding population control.

[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 55 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm pretty sure by Make America Healthy Again they mean let all the sick, disabled, and weakened die off from lack of support.

[–] zeropointone@lemmy.world 15 points 10 hours ago

Absolutely.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 4 points 6 hours ago

Gotta crop off the old timers.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

How do you categorize a Nazi that is fine with all types of people that give him money?

[–] zeropointone@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Who are you talking about?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 hours ago
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Well, orange turd is getting rid of migrants, but as we know, many Americans are not white. So the guy is trying to end the covid vaccine to remove old and weak people which is not a racist move.

Pig is OK I guess.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 21 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Agree. Let Darwin win! I’ll go back to wearing a mask.

[–] zeropointone@lemmy.world 42 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

It's only a matter of time until mask wearers get shot on sight because of "domestic terrorism".

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 40 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I swear, it's not for health! I'm just kidnapping Mexicans!

Unironically, that answer would land you a job on ICE or even in the administration.

[–] Mirror Giraffe@piefed.social 22 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Just wear a kkk mask over it and you'll be fine!

[–] zeropointone@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

You might be onto something.

[–] g0d0fm15ch13f@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] zeropointone@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

That too. And masked cops shooting other masked cops.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Unless you are wearing a full bunny suit, there are still plenty of membranes and fun bits that viruses can get into. I still mask up when I go shopping or whatever, but I also acknowledge that I am fucked either way on a plane and so forth.

Masking is at its most effective when the people who are actually sick wear them. It blocks a large percentage of the greatest source of germs (mouth and nose) passively.

Also: As fun as it is to... use eugenics to tell the white supremacists off, it generally won't be the chuds who suffer the most. It will be the immunocompromised and those on various medications that otherwise wreak havoc with their bodies.

[–] smh@slrpnk.net 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Iirc, glasses help reduce infections, too.

Back in 2020 I'd wear my p99 respirator and goggles at the grocery store, then a full strip into the washer and shower as soon as I came home.

Now I'm more relaxed: n95 or kn94 plus standard prescription glasses, washing hands up to the elbow (makes me feel like I'm on MASH). I still strip as soon as I get home, but not because of COVID.

I've gotten relaxed at work over the summer because there were minimal people in the library. I'm going to go back to full masking outside my office now that the students are back, especially since I don't have a new flu or COVID vaccine available to me.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Glasses help in the sense that they protect your eyes from direct splatter. They do not help once germs are aerosolized and being recirculated constantly.

But yeah, my basic model is more or less a kn95 (that I always should replace more often than I do) to cover my face in stores or whatever where I am not expected to be standing in a crowd for hours on end or sitting down to eat. I keep some with me on travel days but don't bother to wear it unless I myself feel sick because I am going to inevitably need to eat or drink something or I am in a metal box where all the air is being recirculated constantly.

But yeah... I at least know that I am most likely not susceptible to long COVID since I literally caught COVID when it was all kicking off back in 2020 and have gotten it again a few times at varying levels of vaccinated/boostered (last summer was definitely bad but nowhere near as bad as being patient 3 or 4 was). Still gonna mask up but I "know" I'll be fine and am weirdly more worried about the flu.

But... a lot of people are going to die.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 25 points 10 hours ago

Can't have anything that helps people

[–] stupe@lemmy.zip 43 points 11 hours ago

Remember when the Republicans wanted the vaccine to be a choice?

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 46 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Just to be clear, the person making this claim is Dr. Aseem Malhotra, the crazy guy who's gotten into the good graces of RFK Jr. "Crazy Guy who makes Crazy Claims makes another Crazy Claim that aligns with his previous Crazy Claims." For me, I'm sticking this bit of information on the corkboard, but I'm not going to freak out about it. Yet.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

They might also be toying with the market.

I can't imagine the administration, who's primary concern is getting as much money as possible from as many sources as possible, would open themselves to lawsuits AND reduce a chance of fleecing/Intel'ing the pharmaceutical markets that produce highly profitable vaccines.

My bets are they're going to talk it up real big to scare everyone left of "backwoods gooner in a wooden shack" and raise a big narrative that they're doing all the weird shit Conservatives think they want, while trying to exercise a completely brain-damaged tactic against pharma companies to try to negotiate another fascist "cut" of their profits. Then they can quietly forget about it like nearly everything else they've promised to their completely ignorant, unthinking base.

All that said, I am going to have to suffer through a booster ASAP because these fucks are deranged and unpredictable. And if they DO go through with it and I lose anyone I care about to covid, I am going to the hardware store. And I am betting I will have friends.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.zip 14 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

There's also the money involved. The pharmaceutical corporations pretty much have things rigged so they make huge profit off of any drug to market. Even those that aren't really that effective. But when it comes to vaccines, that's a pretty much a guaranteed demand.

That's a lot of dough to grease some wheels, if they needed to; no way any kind of ban like this would actually go through. Not that that should surprise anyone, after all, considering how frequently these morons turn out to be all talk, no substance.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Don’t forget the insurance companies.

They’re doing the math, and they’d probably rather pay for a shot than expensive ICU stays.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That's a lot of dough degrees some wheels, ...

Okay, that took me a minute to decode. To grease some wheels. Voice to text?

[–] forrgott@lemmy.zip 11 points 11 hours ago

No, I'm just stupid. Obviously.

Just kidding, of course; I will fix.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 10 hours ago

im due for one and its enough that im going to go forward and see about getting one while I can. was waiting to get a job offer to have it close to the next point I might be in close contact with folks for long periods of times.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 27 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Didn't the traditional COVID vaccine have way more issues than the mRNA one?

[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 64 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The mRNA vaccine has a shockingly low rate of side effects or adverse reactions. Nearly all of the negatives were less severe versions of symptoms and impacts from COVID. So even if you were impacted by a negative side effect it was likely you were still better off vaccinated than not.

Banning it has nothing to do with the reality, and everythinf to do with their ignorant and dangerous beliefs.

[–] b34k@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Anecdotal, but I got jabbed 4 or 5 times with the mRNA vaccine and got COVID once.

The jabs usually meant that evening and next day I had a splitting headache, extremely uncomfortable lymph node under the armpit of the side I got the jab, and just general tiredness. But 24 hours later it was good and I was fine.

With COVID, I was bedridden for 3 Days. Fevers, splitting headache (worse than the jabs), diarrhea, even vomited once. Even when I got better enough to get out of bed, I had an uncontrollable dry cough that lasted for weeks.

So yes, the jabs weren’t fun, but they were predictable and ended quickly. The disease itself was much worse for me and had a tendency to linger.

[–] smh@slrpnk.net 6 points 8 hours ago

Back when my friends were getting our first COVID jabs, we'd congratulate each other on "a strong immune response" whenever we'd feel crappy afterwards.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 18 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Vaccine skepticism isn’t so much about vaccines per se, it’s following a small movement that grew organically and fanning the flames instead of letting it die in obscurity. The purpose here is using it as a vehicle for promoting skepticism of tried and true science.

What’s the greatest enemy of authority? Tried and true facts with no room for dispute. By effectively undermining vaccines, the way is paved to continue to sow doubt and skepticism for other science, making it easier to dispute facts that can and will undermine authority without thus skepticism.

Yes, the added benefit is population control and distraction. If people are sicker and more financially blown up by medical bills they’re far too busy and demoralized to engage in revolution. And there’s less of them due to death. Brain fog from long COVID is beneficial as well.

In addition, they can pocket the funding that would otherwise go to vaccine programs.

It’s perfect, from an authoritarian viewpoint.

[–] drunkosaurus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

If people are sicker and more financially blown up by medical bills they’re far too busy and demoralized to engage in revolution

The people I would fear the most would be those with nothing to lose.

Which is most of the population at this point. I think this will probably end up being a reminder of the old saying, "Don't count your chickens before they hatch."

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 6 points 10 hours ago

That’s a fair point, but how many terminal cancer patients have you seen make headlines for Luigi style acts?

One of the more interesting points of that odd but good Stewart podcast in which he, a historian who studies revolutions, and the writer of Andor discussed re revolutions is how often things don’t happen even when all the formulaic boxes are checked. There is a list, a recipe, for revolution, but even when all the ingredients are there; it often fizzles.

Same thing regarding what you’re saying, I think.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

It also is one of the conspiracy theories that cross party lines.

The youtuber/failed mythbuster Allen Pan did a video where he made a "vaccine gun" that turned into him being terrified of angering his black camera woman and it turning into a heartfelt video where they both go to "the rich white people CVS" to get their vaccines.

And ignoring that he is a piece of shit with borderline minstrel tendencies, it also kind of summed up a lot of what we saw in 2020/2021. We have a fucking miracle cure that can fix society! A bunch of idiots refuse to get vaccinated. So people decide to clown on them.

Oh shit! We are all racist assholes and the real villains because of the Tuskegee Experiment over 50 years ago! Okay, SOME people have very valid reasons for not getting vaccinated but only them. Fuck, Willowbrook back in the 60s? And Guatemala in the 40s?

Okay... people are allowed to not want to get vaccinated, I guess? And fuck anyone who is immunocompromised or otherwise at risk because they are also racists for caring about living?


And it also "helps" that it plays into the focused effort to vilify academics that we have seen, fairly globally, since the mid-late 20th century.

And, don't get me wrong, absolutely nobody deserves to be in an unethical human experimentation. But... if people actually research the history of medicine they would never want to let any doctor even look at them. Except... that isn't the case. Because, yeah, some REAL fucking evil happened and so has a lot of gross incompetence. Medicine learns from that and actually has philosophical discussions so that even borderline stuff never happens again.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 19 points 11 hours ago

Wouldn't surprise me in the least.

When Taco said "I am your retribution", he was talking both about all his personal vendettas against a lot of the world, but he was also talking about the crazies and all their issues with reality, including properly addressing Covid, meaning lockdowns, social distancing and vaccines.

The unhinged crazies want to drag everyone else down with them.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 10 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

God damn it. If only Genocide Joe had earned our votes and Kamala had smiled a bit less. Remember everybody, nobody vote Democrat until they finally run Bernie in 2028!

Fucking hell.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 4 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I read the /s even if someone else didn't.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 10 hours ago

I'm convinced the right is going to try to mark the next year as 1, so 2028 will never happen.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Are they moving this project forward at Warp Speed by any chance?

[–] imrighthere@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago

They are. They found zero useful resistance, so there is no point in slow walking it anymore.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 11 hours ago

I heard repeatedly "you should have the freedom to choose to be vaccinated or not". Are those people going to just as vigorously argue against banning it?

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 7 points 10 hours ago

Glad I got my yearly last month. Guess next year I'll have to go to Mexico?

[–] wulrus@lemmy.world -1 points 5 hours ago

It was essential and without alternative when it was new, and it's stupid to ban it, as it's still a great choice now, but for most people, non-mRNA alternatives are about as good.

A stupid move, yet possibly with few consequences. I got 2 % of my "fortune" in Moderna stocks though, lol.

Far worse is EU and its member states, which just delayed the release of the new adapted one just enough that everybody can meet in class for 3 weeks after returning from summer vacation before getting it. Although it was ready for shipping a long, long time ago. More madness than the US, for once.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›