And all we get in return are chat systems that make up bullshit facts. I mean, I don't disagree that they can actually do some useful stuff, too. But the proportion of the public that benefits from them in any meaningful way is tiny compared to the cost to the rest of us. I hope a tornado lands on Elon's gas-powered monstrosity in, where, Tennessee, I think? Destroy that shit, please.
this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2025
6 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
75682 readers
2597 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Unlike this place, I bet most people out there actually enjoy Google's AI summaries. I mean, it's almost the Wikipedia article verbatim, but if you just need to know what a thing is, they actually save people time
And in return, they drive traffic away from the sites that collect the information in the first place, causing the sources to lose revenue.
In the case of Wikipedia, it saves them money
It saves them money in the same sense it saves every other information source money, it reduces traffic. But just like other sites can't serve ads without traffic, Wikipedia can't prove its worth and ask for donations without traffic. Eventually, people will start asking themselves why they need to support Wikipedia when Google's AI tells them everything they need to know, unaware that Google's AI can only do so because it scrapes Wikipedia without paying for it.
Tiered pricing would help.
It does
The more you use, the cheaper it is
how can they get away with this? Are data centers not paying their bills?
The way utility rates are set allows them to spread costs onto residential ratepayers instead of bearing it directly.
What? That doesn’t make any sense.
It's essentially supply and demand. If the data center is willing to pay more, then everyone has to pay more. I hate it.
Places like data centers don't pay the same rate that individuals do though. They get an industrial rate.
Basically they cut them a break so they can fuck you. The supply is more More than enough and the only demand that increased was from corporate interests.
It is like Obamacare. You have a person who smokes, gets drunk, eats a lot of sugar, don't exercise, you pay for their bill through hiked premiums, and overutilization. Hopefully, that sinks in.