AnonomousWolf

You can easily replace Beef in your diet with foods that aren't as bad for the environment. It won't taste the same but so what.

You can't cry that nobody needs AI but then in the same breath say that you can't replace beef Something 100x worse for the environment.

Yes nobody NEEDS AI, just like nobody NEEDS beef, or to take a flight, but it's still a nice to have and useful to a lot of people.

Beef is useful? You could just eat chicken and other meats instead. And you be saving the environment 100x more than not using AI

My point is that people shouting that they care about the environment, while being silent on things like beef or flights etc. are being hypocrites. I've seen many people say AI IS BURNING THE PLANNET, when that is simply not true

And that would still be a drop in the bucket compared to beef or taking a flight.

You're missing my point

Fair, but people are shouting that AI is destroying the planet, and pretending like it's worse than cars or beef or flights.

Which weakens actuall reasons to be anti-AI