Blueberrydreamer

Honestly yeah that's even better. How great would it be to watch Chrome slowly die out while funneling money to fight climate change?

Seems like it allows a non profit to assume control of a company without having to pay out funds to actually purchase it. They apparently have to reinvest all profits back into the company rather than directly benefiting from it. Though the article does mention under the proposal, some unspecified portion of Chrome profits would go toward 'climate action', so there's some vague positive out of it.

Seems like it would be pretty great honestly, so I can't imagine it'll be accepted.

That's always the justification isn't it?

See all this does is mislead people who might otherwise talk about legitimate grievances about Tesla. Now they have easily disproved bullshit to spew and will look like idiots who are trapped in liberal media bubbles if they try to talk about this with anyone who's paying attention.

The only advantage we have is the truth, don't let that go.