FreedomAdvocate

joined 3 months ago
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -3 points 3 days ago

Cool story, I’m sure no one using Linux has ever lost any data ever.

This comment of theirs reads like a comment by a Lemmy upvote farming bot tbf

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (15 children)

Good luck playing any of the biggest, most played games in the world without it.

You couldn’t get windows games working in windows?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Doctors try to save everyone, even the 0.01%. Hell, the 0.01% are actually a huge focus.

In software a 0.01% affecting bug in a single one-off update, that needs very specific exact steps to happen, that is already released is at the bottom of the backlog, never to get fixed.

It’s you that clearly doesn’t get “it”. What is your software development background?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The illegal immigrant didn’t follow due process when they entered the country illegally, did she?

Due process to remove her was followed and you know it, which is why you deleted the comment with the link.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

And you’re a perfect fit for an arts degree with how dumb that equivalency is.

We’re talking about software updates here, not saving lives.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Paywalled.

No point posting articles people can’t read.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 6 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Yet again - headline and article are massive overexaggerations, talking about an issue that a few people have had in very specific situations and saying it breaks everyones SSDs/HDDs and might corrupt their data to get people like you to get outraged and spread FUD.

Remember - if even 0.01% of people on Windows 11 get an error with an update, that is like 100k people. A 0.01% error rate is nothing. It's not even worth mentioning. It's not even worth investigating. Sure it sucks for those 100k people, and they'll be complaining to everyone that will listen - but it's not a big issue. That's this. That's this exact thing.

eg explain why the reason I have mentioned and other possible reasons are not good to you? Otherwise you’re not adding much to the conversation.

Your reason is ridiculous and wrong, and you're not adding much to the conversation.

As for why this law exists at all, well it’s actually to the benefit of law enforcement: the idea is that immigrant communities are more likely to cooperate with law enforcement if they aren’t scared that they will be the target of immigration control.

Only illegal immigrants are scared of immigration control. Handicapping law enforcement doesn't benefit law enforcement lol.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I have responded - I don’t agree with artificially handicapping what they can use a law enforcement system for. There’s no good reason for the law.

view more: ‹ prev next ›