JasSmith

joined 2 years ago
[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 6 points 13 hours ago

Yes! It's intentionally used to invoke blame. Foremost by implying that some list of bad behaviours is only or primarily displayed by men, and secondly by implying that it is the fault of men (often read as all men) when they exhibit these behaviours. I would much rather we just call it toxic behaviour. Both sexes are capable of violence, jealousy, etc. "Toxic masculinity" merely ensures half of the people one is speaking to switch off and might even take the opposite side of the discussion because it's really offensive.

[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 5 points 13 hours ago

Yes! We need a translator because what many of them say is not what they actually mean. I kept being told I was emotionally unavailable. So I started opening up more, which killed the attraction pretty quickly. What they meant was that they wanted me to listen to them and react in a way which implied I felt their feelings. Most women definitely DO NOT want a man who is in touch with his emotions or is "emotionally available." They want to feel emotionally validated.

[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You wouldn't believe how many progressive women only date stereotypically conservative men. Here is a metanalysis of five studies showing how women in general prefer men who espouse and act out "benevolent sexism." This is the age old problem for men: women say they want one thing, but date something completely different.

[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This is the worst 4chan space I've ever seen. It's like Reddit's r/Politics. There's a comment decrying the patriarchy with 55 upvotes.