ShimmeringKoi

During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime's atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn't go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them. If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.

-Blackshirts and Reds: Rational Fascism and the overthrow of Communism by Micheal Parenti

If the police in China were never seen to kill anybody, that meant that surely they must be killing in secret. Why they would bother with secrecy or killing at all was never explained

It's really very simple.

If you voted for Palestinian extermination, regardless of your reasons for doing so, you are a nazi.

Liberals spent a year browbeating anyone who pointed this out as a Hamas supporter (based), "unpragmatic" (hilarious) hysterical tankies who could never be pleased. We tried to warn you feckless pack-followers that you were signing on to the ultimate crime. This was your response: to plug your ears and laugh

We tried to warn you, and now It's too late for you motherfuckers to pretend to care about "aurhoritarianism" when you were happy to support it being inflicted on brown people out of sight and out of mind. I hope brunch was worth it, because you're social poison now.